Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not sure. But I noticed that Alex perked up and smiled at the time the prosecution was pointing that out. And Alex chatted with DH and JG, looking quite pleased with himself. I'm guessing he has an explanation for that.Yep, why park over there and not right by the house?
What he's lied about are very important points to his alibi and his actions that night. Those are very pertinent lies, IMO, they matter greatly.I don’t find his lies enough to convict. The state’s burden is high. They can’t just say he’s a liar so he’s guilty. And that’s exactly what they’re doing - he’s a bad man and a liar so he did it. It’s not even close to beyond a reasonable doubt. JMO
I passed out mint flavored binkies for the defense.DH is a problem child.... children act better than him. imo
I didn’t say they don’t matter. I said it’s not enough to convict. They have no other MATERIAL evidence that adds up to guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. JMOWhat he's lied about are very important points to his alibi and his actions that night. Those are very pertinent lies, IMO, they matter greatly.
Wonder if there are any old wells?Feeling he had a stash spot or several in mind at his spread or his mother's place, lots of ground, brush and good spots to hide object's that small. Heck I've stumbled upon cars overgrown with weeds in areas that I've hunting and hiked for years.
So far there I don't think there has been any gps data introduced to indicate where MM's phone was while AM was driving. There was testimony that unlike PM's phone, MM's phone and AM's phone did not generate a lot of gps data. JMO.Sorry if I overlooked this but did MM phone show being in the car traveling up the road...?
When attorney's act like this, it makes me think they have no other way to defense their clients actions other than theatrics and confusion. Maybe the jury isn't supposed to take that into consideration, but I think as humans they likely do. If what is being discussed is very incriminating and there is no real explanation that is innocent for whatever it is, then the defense attorney is acting a fool, I think wow what are they trying to hide/cover up/distract from?DH is a problem child.... children act better than him. imo
True, but I have heard this a couple places, and People Magazine isn't AP News, but thought I'd share this anyway.Why wouldn't they use this information at trial, if true?
Wouldn't be surprised since that area down south is probably dotted with ole wells. My Father has an old well on his property in MO. that's been active with water since the late 1800's.Wonder if there are any old wells?
It's very hard to UNhear anything IMPOV.When attorney's act like this, it makes me think they have no other way to defense their clients actions other than theatrics and confusion. Maybe the jury isn't supposed to take that into consideration, but I think as humans they likely do. If what is being discussed is very incriminating and there is no real explanation that is innocent for whatever it is, then the defense attorney is acting a fool, I think wow what are they trying to hide/cover up/distract from?