I was so frustrated with the legal analysts and their perpetual song of “reasonable doubt,” I had to seek my husband’s opinion since he has no clue about anything related to this case. Hubby is a criminal defense attorney. The only evidence I told him about was the timing of the kennel video in relation to the murders and the fact that until yesterday, the defendant repeatedly lied and said he was not at the kennels. He agreed, hands down he’s guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. Then I told him about the murder weapons belonging to the family and never found. He literally laughed and said only idiots would find there to be any doubt, much less reasonable doubt. We then had a chuckle together, and I felt relieved. We agree that juries usually do the right thing.