pizzaman12
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 3, 2019
- Messages
- 1,780
- Reaction score
- 14,359
What was up with Paul McManigal? That was his scientific testing? You kidding?
AND, if alex was really interested in finding the killers...he would have told them he was at the kennels. He would have told the truth, "I was just there!!" and told them timeframe.The timeline is impossibly short. AM has testified that he did not see or hear others at Moselle. The dogs did not alert. He left after the time of the murders. All documented.
Good question!Do jurors get to keep their phones? Seems like it shows anyone could try this to see what happens like a lot of us have done on WS. Moo
The cellphone toss testimony was not riveting, but I would like to point out that Maggie's phone did get itself to the side of the road, by somebody. Thrown or set down. Tossed or Frisbee. And it's BARD that it came from the vehicle that on that road at that time, slowing down before accelerating en route to Moselle, seeing as that driver had just been in close proximity to MM. And had no legitimate reason to have her phone apart from her.
I toss the phone toss expert.
I hug the GPS data.
I wonder if Alec regrets his decision. Two more bullets and he could've assassinated the phones too.
JMO
Haha! Poor guy!What was up with Paul McManigal? That was his scientific testing?
Oh I agree that there’s much more to this than we know, but as far as the murders go there is no plausible way anyone besides Alex could have committed them. That’s irrespective of any mistakes SLED made and irrespective of what else Alex was involved in.
I bet Duffy Stone probably does...being the Solicitor, so previous ones might have also had them? JMODid Alex's dad have blue lights?
What was up with Paul McManigal? That was his scientific testing? You kidding?
I respectfully disagree with that because of PM and MM's phones going dark at the times they did. All just my interpretationThere is also a larger window of when they could have been killed. Could have been at 9:30 or 9:45 or even later
The motive is not there for me though (even though I think he did it).
I don't believe prosecution needs to prove motive. Is that just something that you seek? mooThere is also a larger window of when they could have been killed. Could have been at 9:30 or 9:45 or even later
The motive is also not there for me (even though I think he did it).
Women. We are too gosh darn emotional!!Omg did DH really say she's going off on a diatribe.. like his client didn't go off on many diatribes. Now he's badgering her and trying to belittle her.
Agreed despite the cell phone data the phone didn't grow legs and run down the road to the ditch.The cellphone toss testimony was not riveting, but I would like to point out that Maggie's phone did get itself to the side of the road, by somebody. Thrown or set down. Tossed or Frisbeed. And IMO it's BARD that it came from the vehicle that was on that road at that time, slowing down before accelerating, en route to Moselle, seeing as that driver had just been in close proximity to MM. And had no legitimate reason to have her phone apart from her.
I toss the phone toss expert.
I hug the GPS data.
I wonder if Alec regrets his decision. Two more bullets and he could've assassinated the phones too.
JMO
Mixing up heavy cocktails, need another do you lol.Where is the drink train pls
Both of their cell phones ceased all activity at 8:49, within 30 seconds of each other. Both had been consistently using their cell phones up to that point. Not even the defense is disputing that is when they were killed.There is also a larger window of when they could have been killed. Could have been at 9:30 or 9:45 or even later
The motive is also not there for me (even though I think he did it).