Sunshynn
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 17, 2014
- Messages
- 437
- Reaction score
- 4,884
Same!I have been tossing my iphone around for weeks to see what it will do, lol. No video. Sorry.
Ha ha.
Same!I have been tossing my iphone around for weeks to see what it will do, lol. No video. Sorry.
The timeline is impossibly short. AM has testified that he did not see or hear others at Moselle. The dogs did not alert. He left after the time of the murders. All documented.While I do think he did it or somehow was involved. I am on the fence on if they proved there is no other reasonable explanation for the murders. I think he is most likely guilty, but there is a chance someone else did it. His family is so influential in that area who knows what people helped him cover things or "looked the other way" when investigating for evidence. He is still on the hook for 99+ other charges after this as well that are much easier to prove
One of the Sheriff's Alex said gave him permission to install blue lights in his personal Suburban said he never gave him permission nor did he ever have a conversation with Alex about it.What did I miss about blue lights that required a rebuttal witness?? I really hope the state calls a drug counselor or doctor. You would think one or both sides would call someone from AM's rehab days
For anyone who saw the Netflix doc, that narrative has been shredded.Dick and Jim have been all over the airways for the past year and a half, shaping the narrative they prefer. Most media has just eaten it up because most media is lazy these days. Plus, Alex hired a PR firm long ago. I’m convinced the Murdaugh camp has paid minions to spread their narrative on social media.
Oh I agree that there’s much more to this than we know, but as far as the murders go there is no plausible way anyone besides Alex could have committed them. That’s irrespective of any mistakes SLED made and irrespective of what else Alex was involved in.I mean, one could say SLED had tunnel vision and didn't exert much energy into looking into other theories. For me, the amount of money that's been changing hands with AM, Curtis Eddie Smith, the amount spent on pills, etc...just doesn't add up to me. I've said since the beginning and I still feel there is much more to what happened. I'm wrong all the time but it just don't add up to me.
Yes it appears. And I believe there was some earlier thread discussion perhaps last week about perjury, and how it might occur.BINGO!
That AM lied under oath about getting the Sheriff's permission to install blue cop lights in his personal vehicle...in a nutshellWhat did I miss about blue lights that required a rebuttal witness?? I really hope the state calls a drug counselor or doctor. You would think one or both sides would call someone from AM's rehab days
I’m not at all trying to be combative here, but you are one of the posters who seems to solidly be in the “not guilty” camp. I honestly want to know- who/how do you think this happened, based on what we know? Someone else knew they were at the kennels, pulled up, unheard by Alex, picked up 2 of the M’s guns, killed them (again unheard by Alex) took Maggie’s phone, and left, all within minutes of Alex being there? And all without leaving any evidence they were ever there? Just want to know what you think, it might help persuade me or others otherwise.Watched Ms. Smith last night. Seems caught up in a story she embellished.
Dr. R, on re-direct, pitiful and fell apart.
Mr. Crosby - established that Paul was the blackout lover.
Reasonable doubt.
Hung jury.
If it’s not proven, describe a plausible theory of who, besides Alex, could have murdered Paul and Maggie. The State doesn’t have to prove the motive if they’ve proved conclusively that he committed the murders. There are some questions that will remain unanswered, but that does not equate to reasonable doubt about the murderer.Mr. Harpo is an excellent trial lawyer as is the other defense attorney. As good as it gets.
With all the half-truths, lies from the past, stealing, drugs, it still doesn't prove that AM killed his family.
What motive? Having Paul dead would not affect the boat lawsuit at all.
Mags was going to divorce him? So what? Nothing from nothing is nothing.
They hid his pills? So what? He can get more.
SLED was shady AF with the shirt lie and the raincoat.
I would have to vote NG.
thanks!One of the Sheriff's Alex said gave him permission to install blue lights in his personal Suburban said he never gave him permission nor did he ever have a conversation with Alex about it.
MOO
Do jurors get to keep their phones? Seems like it shows anyone could try this to see what happens like a lot of us have done on WS. MooDon't really think this witness was necessary. He kind of bombed and was no help at all.