borndem
Anglophile & registered demwit
- Joined
- May 15, 2010
- Messages
- 19,502
- Reaction score
- 52,035
Downtownbrown said: ↑
As stated before, I’m the mom of 5 and wife on an Uber/Lyft driver. This opinion I’m about to give was very unpopular on a friends facebook post and I was called mean, insensitive and a poor excuse for a mother, but here goes. The whole idea that an Uber driver has to say your name is false. Uber discourages it, at least in my area which is Miami/Ft Lauderdale because of fraud. The scam is the driver says, “Are you Carol?” the rider says “yes” gets in.
>>> respectfully snipped by borndem for space <<<
Maybe what I am suggesting here is already being done -- or is too complicated -- or is not good enuff for security -- or can't be done due to whatever...I'm sorry your spouse has been taken by scammers -- perhaps driving in Florida adds to his misery. Nonetheless, I think your example demonstrates why the solution should be a dual party approach. Both drivers and riders must share the responsiblity for their own safety.
>>> respectfully snipped by borndem for space <<<
MOO
When a call for a ride is made, the Uber or Lyft rep assigns the requestor a password and also tells the caller what the driver's password is.
When the car arrives, the rider and driver exchange passwords and on with the show. The passwords are only good for that one ride. This puts a bit of a burden of the Uber/Lyft driver to keep up with passwords, but s/he has to also know the pick-up address so what's one more word?
Each party is indeed in potential danger, so let's be sure of things from both sides.