Be sure to follow the dates of all articles and links. Some information is posted out of chronological order (which is totally fine) but it can get confusing as to what information came out when.The school said they over did it on the mouth rinsing but removed that requirement before the protests. They said this almost the day after the story broke.With respect this is a blogger's opinion piece, she mentioned but failed to provide any links to the actual threats made in news article comments or proof that any of the protesting parents made any of those threats. I honestly don't see how continuing to fuel the fire, whipping up even more outrage, fomenting email campaigns and the like is helpful to the child or her parents at this point.
Do we KNOW for sure what the parents were told their kids would have to do? I'd LOVE to see the initial letter that went out to them since we've had reports of everything from mouthwashing to lysol wipes, we've had school authorities backpedaling and toning down the measures they originally said had to be enforced. Frankly this is a big mess and not likely to get any less messy until EVERYONE takes a deep breath, steps back and allows some reason to prevail.
My suspicion is that they removed the restriction after a lot of negative feedback, but before the parents protested. I also suspect the school did not effectively communicate with all the parents in the first place which led to them drawing all kinds of crazy conclusions and passing bad information around.
The school has not backpedaled, but has remained fairly consistent,imo.
I concur, this is a mess, like a giant game of operator with the little girl as the big loser in all of this.
The report of the threats comes from a support blog where the mom posts with other mothers with kids that have problems. There is good information there, including what the actual plan was.
here is the link, but we have been careful not to carry any posts over here. thanks
http://www.facebook.com/home.php?sk=group_147133302017093