*Lash*
Justice 4 Rebecca
- Joined
- May 11, 2012
- Messages
- 3,003
- Reaction score
- 67
There is also the presumption that a sexual assault would be by a man, perpetrated upon Rebecca, a woman.
IMO, there is a serious lack of imagination from authorities such as Gore, that sexual assault could have occurred perpetrated by a WOMAN upon Rebecca.
Men aren't the only gender capable of sexual assault. Sex assault by a woman upon a woman yield a whole DIFFERENT quality and quantity of evidence.
I don't for a minute believe Rebecca was the victim of a random or violent homosexual assault. I believe Rebecca was assaulted in a way to sexually humiliate her, and the evidence POINTS to another woman. That is a whole different perspective, that would NOT show up on a traditional "sex assault" exam. But it is STILL "sexual assault" IMO.
It's also "regular" assault, IMO. Violent assault.
A person can be sexually assaulted with a foreign object. Depending on how violently the object was used it may or may not leave visible evidence of a vaginal assault or trace evidence from the object.
As stated above in this thread, a non vaginal assault can occur leaving DNA evidence on something like panties. I still cannot believe the panties were not tested and simply because of Jonah's words. I don't even have to believe a sexual assault occurred to question why the panties were not tested. Panties found at a crime scene in a quest house, the person staying in the guest house reported finding the victim and also claimed to be watching *advertiser censored* right before finding the victim should have been tested if this was indeed an unbiased investigation.