That's what I want to know. Was the Helio with the sex tape recording the same phone as the finger injury and June 3 selfies?
Maybe she hid the phone after the murder because she realized the selfies could incriminate her? Then once she changed to a self defense strategy and wanted to charge Travis as a pedophile, she remembers the 12 year old girl comment on the tape and decides it's worth the risk to let her family know where to "find" the phone.
But then, why a police report on May 18? Plus, Hope points out Martinez could easily subpoena Helio for evidence of if a new phone was or was not shipped to her...
I'm with you. I need the phone mystery solved. I believe they "found" the phone for the text messages--that I doubt Travis even wrote--and for the recordings, like you say. It was a huge risk to bring it forward with those selfies on it; however, it was the defense's assertion that she'd been dark-haired all along, and Columbo was mistaken.
I believe she made Helio 1 go missing on May 18th for some other hinky reason that had to do with Travis in Mid-May but I cannot figure out what it is.
From what I understand, all the phone evidence she presented, the sex in the woods text, the selfies, the recordings, and the finger injury picture were on Helio 1, the stolen Helio. They have never in trial differentiated which Helio they are talking about, so there has to be just one they are discussing. Which is why I want to know what phone she got arrested with. I have to look at JM's re-cross about the finger pics to see how he recall how he responded to them.
It's apparent that she was talking to people on some phone after May 18th. It doesn't seem likely that the police wouldn't confiscate whatever phone she was using at the time of the arrest. So there has to be a second phone. someone put forth the assertion that the phone she claimed she'd ruined in chocolate hadn't really been ruined, and the police took that phone into custody upon her arrest. If that's true, it might be possible that she NEVER contacted Helio for a replacement phone or that she called back and canceled it.
As for whether JM determined this was the case or not, we won't know. He wrote in his book, for example, that he chose not to call Lisa Andrews as his witness because he thought it would bring in JA's prior bad acts and be too prejudicial or cause grounds for an appeal in regard to the tires and JA showing up at her house or watching them sleep. He wrote that JW wound up bringing it into the case, though, anyway. It might be the case that he chose not to bring it in about the insurance lie for a reason we don't know. Same as he didn't bring in the bikini pics, and he didn't show the CD pictures even though he used the CDs as premeditation.
I suppose the statement above about Lisa is the reason JM didn't bring in a lot of people who could have testified to things that we've gleaned from texts and journals.
But--if the phone police report was actually dated May 18th--then something hinky was going on at that time. It's possible that JM could solicit Helio about the insurance claim, and it's possible that he might have done so. But it's also possible that Helio, who used Sprint networks, so JA's phone was indeed on Sprint, either didn't keep records that far back (by the time JM might decide to search for it) or they could have been out of business by May 2010. In March 2010, Sprint alerted in March 2010 that it would stop servicing Helio customers in by May. Helio 1 was "found" in 2010, but I can't recall what month.
But-- a Sprint representative did testify to her phone calls on June 2nd and 3rd. I had thought he was testifying for Travis' for some reason but I was wrong. Joe Citizen was testifying for Travis' records. It's possible that Sprint kept the call log, but not the other account information and Helio, out of business, couldn't pull up anything.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helio_(wireless_carrier)
JM might not have had a need to go investigate the insurance claim until the "stolen phone" surfaced in 2010. In fact, whatever phone the police confiscated might have been the only one they concentrated on until 2010. If they had Helio 2 in custody as of July 2008, then it goes along with what her journal says. If they had a different phone in custody, I would think they'd want to know where the insurance phone is, but that is only if they were even focusing on what she wrote in a journal on May 18th and May 21st. In totality of the evidence on hand, the insurance and replacement seem like such a small detail to investigate. If they didn't finger print the shower or Travis' computer (to my knowledge) why investigate Helio?
It's just confusing, and at one point, I decided that she had all three phones in the car on the trip. Back then, wasn't it as easy as slipping a SIM card from one phone to another to change phones? Or is it that simple still? Maybe she had a whole other phone and service no one even knew about.
On the other hand, I have to keep in mind that JA didn't have a bunch of money for all that, and it would be expensive to maintain another phone--unless it was a prepaid or disposable one, I guess.
Also important to note is that JA didn't have her own Internet service while in Mesa, and she'd often go to Travis' house to "check her emails." I just shifted topics. Sorry. I was about to talk about how likely or unlikely it was that she could snoop on his internet activities constantly if she didn't have her own Internet as part of the rent for the room she had in Mesa. I assume she'd use her own laptop at Travis' on wifi, so he couldn't "backspace" into her accounts. hee...hee... I have to compose a whole nother post that one.
All of this is just speculation off the cuff about the phone. I don't assert of any my theories as fact. But I really think she was up to something on May 18th if indeed there exists a police report for the phone dated at that time.