From Brad Smith on the Official Super Duper:
Brad Smith
18 hrs
"Just a reminder to those who believe that Jodi would never willing give a guy a blowie the first week she met him, or that she wouldn't engage in kinky sex or slutty costumes on her own volition.
Abe said after a date with Jodi—when asked if she was wearing magic panties, her response was, "no, but there's magic in my panties". That is a very sexually charged phrase and a young woman who was sexually bashful would never say anything like that. Only a sexually confident and even sexually aggressive woman would say such a thing.
Ryan said after his post-murder makeout session that Jodi was very sexually aggressive and take-charge and was grinding on him and adjusting his penis for maximum enjoyment
Darrell said that Jodi was very sexually aggressive on their first date. When pressed, he realized that it had said to much, so backpedaled a bit and said they were both sexually aggressive with one another.
Abe, Ryan and Darrell all admitted Jodi was sexually confident and a proactive partner.
According to supporters though, Jodi was shy and uncomfortable with Travis. Why? Of all the men, he was her ideal match according to her—why be shy with him and give it up so easily to an older, less attractive guy (Darrell)."
And here's a response by Dr. Robert Glover:
http://www.drglover.com/blog/x_post/why-you-should-run-from-a-seductive-woman-00036.html
Sorry, this is a bit long, but I think you'll get the drift...
There are two ways a woman can be sexually seductive:
The first is from an open, conscious place.
The woman sends signals that she is receptive to you and is available to your sexual advance.
She doesn’t try to "seduce" you, i.e., act overtly sexual, expose herself, or act aggressively.
She gives signals of her receptivity (smiling, making eye contact, laughing at your jokes, touching your arm, leaning in, revealing herself reciprocally) and leaves it to you to be the man and take action (penetrate her with your presence and sexuality).
She isn't going to try to get you to like her by displaying her body parts, using overt innuendo, or being sexually aggressive.
A conscious woman is very seductive (receptive and inviting), but because she knows her worth, not because she needs a man to validate her by being sexually attracted to her.
The second way a woman can seduce is from a closed, unconscious place.
The woman acts sexually aggressive, because she knows what to do to get a man to want her (e.g., give him a *advertiser censored* in the front seat of his car on the first date, make graphic sexual statements or innuendo, or text him shots of her *advertiser censored* after first meeting).
This kind of seduction comes from a place of unconsciousness and insecurity and usually signals a history of being sexually exploited.
This woman doesn't believe men could like her or be attracted to her just as she is. And because the only way they could want her is sexually, she believes she has to use her sexuality.
So there are two types of seduction.
The first is from a place of self-respect, openness, and self-love.
The second is from a place of feeling inadequate and having to resort to sexual manipulation for validation and connection.
It is the second kind of woman from which I run.
These women are usually beyond insecure – they are deeply wounded and will quickly pull you into their internal emotional abyss. They may initially come on hot, but they usually turn cold just as quickly. They typically have difficulty being honest and faithful (and the more they claim to be, the less I believe them), because they need constant validation from various men. You will often notice that they still have one or more ex’s in the loop.
You will never come out ahead with women like this (unless you have amazing boundaries and don’t fool yourself into thinking that you are doing anything but messing around with a really messed up woman).
), but IIRC her baptism was actually delayed because the church had a problem with the fact she was still living with DB, no matter what lies she told the missionaries etc. about their arrangement.
