Pocket-
FWIW, any analysis is up to you..
During trial, after juror questions to the , in JM's follow-up to the questions, on the stand, JM asks a series of questions related to the pedo lie. The says in her replies:
1. That she told MM about the pedo in APRIL 2008.
2. That she first told a psychologist about the pedo in 2009. If true, that's really rather interesting.
I think it likely is true, because she added details about the psychologist she told: that it was a man, by interference it couldn't have been Samuels, and where the psychologist practiced.
It has never occurred to me, but of course it makes sense that her FIRST defense team must have hired psych evaluations of the .
Whatever evaluations were done by her first team were never introduced at trial. Until mentioned the 2009 psychologist, in fact, none of the testifying experts or the attorneys had ever mentioned that evaluations had been done prior to Dr. Samuels' initial eval in December 2009.
Makes one wonder if part of the reason the wanted to fire her first attorney (Schaeffer) was because Schaeffer either didn't believe the pedo lie, or because she wasn't willing to include the pedo lie in whatever case she was building, which after all, was still necessarily based on the ninjas lie.
----
Also, and during Nurmi's follow up to juror questions, he asked the why she waited so long to tell the truth- that she killed TA in self-defense, lol.
She included in her long-winded reply that she'd waited so long because she wanted to protect TA's reputation, and....that she hadn't wanted to tell about the physical abuse because THAT WOULD HAVE INDICATED SHE HAD MOTIVE to kill Travis.