chestergal
Former Member
- Joined
- May 9, 2009
- Messages
- 400
- Reaction score
- 0
----- do I hear crickets chirping? -----
And now you know why I left JMM behind :bang:I can't go to that site as it may cause me to experience temporary blindness, an extreme spike in blood pressure, and a possible trashing of my stuffed elephant. LOL
This is the point I was trying to make. Keep an open mind one way or the other. It is just a suggestion.
I think an "open mind" and "innocent until proven guilty" is for the jury.It's very difficult to get this involved in a case and not form an opinion.
There's no reason to not have an opinion, in fact, I would think it
stranger to make yourself have an "open mind" when there is no reason to.
We're here to sleuth...and the bottom line for the real sleuthers (and I am not a real one is to find enough information to form an opinion.
We've got enough for me to "think" CC did it...no alarm system with his experience of his family being threatened and his job in security leaves no doubt in my mind that he wasn't feeling personally threatened enough to warrant security.
My house is armed and I have no personal reason other than wanting the feeling of security.
^i^
Wrinkles,
Nice spin .. that is not what I said, and I believe you know that.
CC might have been charged with the decision as to who had access to Meyer or not.
Gee ... shoot me down in the water again!
This is getting tiresome. Since I can't mention all the scenarios, just look at some churches lately where gunmen have entered churches during worship and shot not only church members but the pastor as well.
It has been reported that Meyer, in some articles in 2004, had received death threats.
Please give me the space to have my opinion as I do you without this ever-so-subtle but very obvious to me veiled sarcasm directed towards my difference of opinion.
So .... going back to my question the other day that was not entertained by anyone .. what is to keep the real killer from fleeing?
I don't think, as you know, it's Coleman. So maybe this guy is squirming but thinking they will "pin it" on Coleman
But what's to keep him from doing a disappearing act ... as no one but LE knows who they wish to arrest.
So .... going back to my question the other day that was not entertained by anyone .. what is to keep the real killer from fleeing?
I don't think, as you know, it's Coleman. So maybe this guy is squirming but thinking they will "pin it" on Coleman
But what's to keep him from doing a disappearing act ... as no one but LE knows who they wish to arrest.
Yes. A GJ can investigate and hand down an indictment without all of the forensic testing having been completed. The preliminary test results can be used. The autopsy is complete (not certain about the Coronor's Inquest) and everything except the Toxicology reports are back, imo. They don't need all of the evidence to be used at trial, but enough to warrant a charge and an arrest. It would mean they have sufficient evidence to prove the crime was committed by a person, but like in the case of Casey Anthony...may not have a body or all of the evidence available.Grand Jury... Based on the present situation, investigators mostly done, state's attorney with file in hand -- is it possible that at this moment a Grand Jury could be looking at things to help make a call as to accuse the perp that the investigators found?
Kinda dumbish here... how could the Grand Jury be used to get a perp in custody prior to when all forensics are in, or can it?
W
LOL Maybe they should just hire us as the ultimate 13th juror. :crazy:I wonder if there will come a day in the near future where they ask jurors do you post or read on WS? :crazy: