analytical
I think, therefore I am......
- Joined
- May 9, 2009
- Messages
- 944
- Reaction score
- 3
Originally Posted by jnTexas
I thought about that, but strangulation is a very personal crime. Either way though he would still be guilty of murder.
Manual strangulation would be very personal. You could strangle a person in very impersonal ways however. You could use a zip tie for instance, cinch it tightly around a person's neck, and walk away, moving on the the next victim.
A person could probably do 3 sleeping people in this way in under a minute. If you woke up with a zip tie tightened around your neck, I'm sure you would be far too panicky to do anything useful to save your own life in the few seconds of consciousness you had left.
I had NO idea you could strangle someone like that. Zip ties to me, are those things you use to hang Christmas lights around the porch. IF the perp did use zip ties, LE can usually find the manufacturer (maybe I watch too much Forensic Files) -- but I've watched how they retrace stuff right back to the store.
If in fact true, I hope this proves to be a good lead for LE and could be the reason it's taking so long for an arrest.
Best,
Mel
Gave me the "creepie crawlies" too but the bigger question is why a poster would "pop in" and so elaborately detail such a method ... refer to 3 people .. etc.
To quote Wrinkles, wouldn't that be a pistol if this were the method of strangulation?
Strange that a poster "fortells" in graphic detail .. at least from my keyboard ... the actual method used?