Did anyone else catch the reference Stanton made to *homicides* when talking about reassigning investigative roles ?
Does this imply that homicides were discovered during the course of the Kyron Horman investigation ? Is this one of the things they wish they did not know ? Or are they wishing they had known earlier rather than later?
I am reading between the lines here, I know , but .......
The quote in more context:
""At this point, Staton anticipates seeking only "minimal" -- if any -- extra money from Multnomah County commissioners for the investigation. His office has absorbed the costs by scaling back in some areas, he said, and reassigning people from the felony-warrant unit, patrol division and special-investigations unit that pursues many drug-related crimes. But the office cannot continue to do that, he said.
"I've got cases that my detectives are supposed to be working on," Staton said. "They might not be homicides, but when you start talking about domestic violence, assault, that's stacking up.""
When someone uses 1 million 44 thousand dollars of the people's money, they really need to account for it. In his case, there has been no accounting nor anything to show for it. So, now he is discussing why a smaller "task force is the "fiscally responsible" strategy for continuing the investigation and bringing it to a conclusion".
To me, none of it makes any sense in relation to Kyron's case. If they are 8 to 10 people and four months away from a 'conclusion', then, it just baffles me as to what they have accomplished and what they intend to accomplish.
Its all gobbledy goop to me.
And, I don't think he is implying anything about homicides at all.
http://www.oregonlive.com/portland/index.ssf/2010/09/new_strategy_in_kyron_horman_c.html