krkrjx
The answer is blowin' in the wind.
- Joined
- May 4, 2010
- Messages
- 13,134
- Reaction score
- 43,588
The 'expert' witness does not anticipate authoring a report on behalf of the convict.
The prosecutor requested the addresses of the especially cruel lying torture murderess's witnesses, but the convict refused to provide them, saying that they preferred to work through Nurmi/Willmott.
JSKS so ordered.
There will be 3 100-juror panels reporting for voir dire on September 29 with 16 days allotted for same.
State requested to interview the convict's witnesses on September 5, 6, and 7.
Instead, JSKS ordered that the State must interview the convict's 'expert' witness on September 2.
Convict demanded that her 'investigator' be granted access to the crime scene.
JSKS ordered that the State must accommodate this by scheduling such access on or before August 28.
Arias is calling the tune, and JSKS is fiddling.
Not for the court, maybe, but she will report her findings post interview to JA. JA in her motion said she needed time to go over the witness findings (or whatever phrase she used) prior to trial, and that she needed three weeks to do all she needed done.