fruity
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 15, 2011
- Messages
- 3,300
- Reaction score
- 101
JMO, but I think he is speaking on behalf of the entire jury because he manipulated it to be this way ...
No doubt, being the foreman, he is an aggressive type of person -- and from what he has said in his interviews, I have no doubt he was manipulating deliberations to reflect his "personal beliefs" -- NOT the facts ...
His obvious "affection" for Jodi has me completey outraged ...
And he claims he did not know how much media focus was on this case -- Really ?
And then he says that Jodi was tried in the "court of public opinon" ? Now HOW does he know this IF he was NOT following the news on this case ?
He is making contradictory statements ... so I want him to keep talking and keep telling on himself ...
The 8 DP'ers need to come out and set the record straight ... like now !
:moo:
BBM.
He said that this wasn't the case:
BUT if he isn't telling the truth I hope the other jurors speak out. Let's face it, his perception of things isn't quite in line with the majority so there's a chance that his view of the deliberations aren't the same as everyone else's.Zervakos described the jury's deliberations behind closed doors as "very, very difficult" and "very emotional." The 12 jurors didn't try to coerce each other, he said. They respected each others' positions.
Link to the quote:
http://www.freep.com/usatoday/article/2359903