InALandFarFarAway
Lah di freakin' dah
- Joined
- Apr 10, 2013
- Messages
- 1,138
- Reaction score
- 0
BBM~ I am very concerned over this. Maybe Nurmi is right with regards to the witch trials. :facepalm:
Nurmi was right in that regard.
I wouldn't take history lessons from Kirk Nurmi.
If Nurmi - fanning the flames, creating drama and pretty much doing what he was accusing Juan of doing - wants to go all hysterical and hyperbolic, then a better metaphor would have been CMja is being subjected to a Madoff hunt.
Because regarding the Salem "witch" trials, Judge Samuel Sewall publicly acknowledged guilt and mistakes. On January 14, 1697, the General Court ordered a day of fasting and soul-searching for the tragedy of Salem.
In 1702, the court declared the trials unlawful. In 1711, the colony passed a bill restoring the rights and good names of those accused and granted £600 restitution to their heirs.
And Massachusetts finally apologized for the events of 1692.
Not a snowball chance in a hot place is CMja a "victim" of "persecution" and there won't ever be a judge or a court anywhere on this spinning green earth who will ever, ever offer an apology to CMja or to her family because she was wrongfully tried and wrongfully convicted. And if she's put to death, there will never be an apology from any court because she was "wrongfully executed."
Nurmi needs to head back to school so that he can at least make histrionic metaphors that accurately apply.
P.S. I just hate it when misinformed people like Kirk Nurmi try to create sympathy by comparing their clients to persecuted martyrs.