NocturnalLady
New Member
- Joined
- Apr 13, 2009
- Messages
- 1,312
- Reaction score
- 10
I really wish the state had introduced her actual activities that morning as a rebuttal to her claims. Wasn't she either texting or on the computer most of the time? While that might make it clear that GA was watching her daughter and not her (which could have caused difficulty given her ludicrous story), it would have certainly shot holes in the fact she was "sleeping hard" with her door locked - a fact in itself she contradicts when she accuses her father of bursting through the door).
If she was on either the phone or computer the entire time (both before and after she claims the incident happened) then at the very least she didn't even bother reacting to the news her child had "drowned". To a sane person that would indicate nothing happened at all (although I realize the 12 we are talking about don't require actual facts or logic to leap to conclusions).
This is so reminiscent of Mark Twain's exposure of James Fennimore Cooper's atrocious impossibilities of time, space and logic appearing throughout his stories that were apparently unnoticed by his audience. I guess not that much has changed in the past couple centuries when it comes to critical thinking.
Wish I could thank this post 20,00 times! I also wish that the prosecution brought the cell phone & text activity into the trial. IMHO there is no good reason why they ignored this information. It's EVIDENCE - proving that ALL of Casey's stories about the events of that morning are pure hogwash. Why why why wasn't this brought out in trial???