when I first started visiting this site it was all about the actual "sleuthing". that was back when this case began. it was very interesting then. a persons opinion, suggestion was just that, and some ran with it to try and prove, or disprove your post. now i see that when somebody (like myself) posts an opinion they are hung with the "KC supporter" tag. personally, I am not convinced of anything with this case. but i assure you that i am not a "KC supporter" simply because from the beginning she did not report anything with regards to her daughter, as well as the things that went on in her life during those 30+ days that Caylee was "missing".
scanning over the last few posts in this thread I realized that I can disprove some of these statements! duct tape magically losing its adhesiveness, then getting it back? sure...not magically, and probably not to the extent that you would end up with the results here. but...tape gets pulled off, temps go down and adhesive hardens to some extent, water moves said tape, weather changes and the heat comes back/adhesive softens and becomes sticky once again. I have personally seen, and done this! so, unless you have tried this yourself, your opinion is just that, your opinion. why would you label somebody with some ugly name because they have offered an opinion?
RK destroying scene? I can see that! doesnt make me a KC supporter, nor am I thinking that RK did something to destroy the scene on purpose. I dont think it so strange that duct tape got attached to the skull/hair then fell over the rest of the skull when he picked it up with his tool.
no, I dont support KC at all. for me not too much has been proven with this case. Jury got it right, DA should have went for lesser....