The jurors ignored the duct tape evidence. They ignored the decomp evidence in the car. They ignored the fact that Caylee was not reported missing for 31 days, and that even then it was a fluke, i.e., not a report Casey made or wanted her mom to make.
They ignored Casey's antics over the infamous 31 days, calling it "normal behavior for a young gal."
It seems it never even occurred to jurors to question why a baby who dies accidentally in a backyard swimming pool would be found triple bagged in the woods some months later.
They bought Baez's George is a child rapist theory, without one shred of evidence to back it up.
And we are expected to believe that this missing computer evidence would have sealed Casey's fate in the eyes of the jury? I'm not buying that. It's important evidence no doubt, but so is all the evidence that was entered in at trial...very telling evidence that was totally ignored by that jury.
So I agree that this could be an "easy out" for the jurors, a way for them to claim they would have voted differently had they only known about this. But even if they do say that, it will not wash, with all things considered.
Though I've always had a sneaking suspicion that the chloroform might have been due to CA trying to clean the car of possible evidence against FCA during the time CA had control of the car. After all, CA admitted removing and cleaning the knife, FCA's pants, and Caylee's beloved mama doll. CA had shifted into save-FCA-mode at that point and chloroform has been used as a dry cleaning spot remover--particularly in older products. (http://www.dhs.wisconsin.gov/eh/chemfs/fs/chloroform.htm) A family that still had rolls of duct tape from Ohio, might have had dry cleaning spot cleaner fluid on hand too. MOO
