What I don't understand though is why didn't Rose use her own cell phone to call 911 right away and when they didn't show up in 5 minutes I would have been calling them back screaming "where are you?":furious:
I am not concerned that much about the timeline. IMO, OSBI has all records of any communications that day. They know the timeline and they seem very comfortable with it and I think it lines up with all the witnesses they have in this case that are not family members.
imoo
Rose wouldn't have been expecting the girls to "show up" I don't think Rose knew the girls had gone on a walk until after they were dead - not until the call at 5:10-ish with the Plackers. My scenario says that maybe Claudia thought the girls MIGHT walk to where they were and went to look for them and therefore wasn't right there when Peter called to say the girls were dead....and THAT'S why Rose had to call Claudia. It's just what I think MIGHT have happened, nothing more (unless Claudia was NOT at the farm up the road when Rose was there before she went to PU SKyla OR Claudia mis-spoke and there was no call at all from Rose because Claudia was there when Peter called Rose and told her the girls were dead).
I know what Claudia SAYS happened that day (and when) but she also said she was a veterinarian, that she saw up close (and touched) Skyla's body at the murder scene and we know neither of those things is factual.
And The Farrows and Rose are pretty much not on great terms at the moment because Claudia and Jimmy were talking to the press and making all sorts of statements that were NOT TRUE. Rose has had to take some pretty major steps to stop Claudia and Jimmy from doing further interviews - you'll note that the Farrows have been silent since about a week after the murders and that the ONLY person to speak publicly about Skyla since that 1st week was her Stepfather, who spoke briefly at the vigil last weekend.
My point is that we shouldn't hang our hats on what either of the Farrows have said publicly - the ONLY person who knows everything that happened (and when) from Rose's perspective that day is ROSE and she is not talking to the media, but according to people in Weleetka, Rose is telling her side, to her friends. Those people are saying Rose talked to Skyla and 4:30-ish and is so happy she did, she got to talk to Skyla one last time. That Rose discovered that no-one was home at the Plackers when the girls were out walking and that when she called Peter and Vicky (becuase Skyla didn't answer her phone around 5PM) The elder Plackers were NOT at home, but did not TELL ROSE they were not at home. Rose is also saying she was so upset she didn't catch what Peter said that day "
when I got home I went looking for them and they're dead" ) when he called her to tell her he had found the girls dead. And I'm sure by the time Rose could have called 911 (and maybe she did?) Peter was already calling them and was on the phone with them when Rose drove up.
We may NEVER know what happened from Rose's perspective that day, unless she decides to talk to the media herself or allows her husband to talk to them on her behalf or she speaks at the trial (when and if there is one). I just find the information about what happened (and when and why) is more logical if Rose is telling the truth. And I don't blame anyone in this except the Killer(s).
My Opinion