Ruflossn
"Silence is the most perfect expression of scorn."
- Joined
- Jun 18, 2008
- Messages
- 1,024
- Reaction score
- 1
http://www.stamfordadvocate.com/def...ion-in-case-of-missing-girl-430390.php#page-2
"This agency is insulated from public scrutiny, and I'm beginning to wonder if that's a serious concern here," Morrissette said.
The above bolded / underlined words are the exact ones I have thought myself. The OSBI is not held accountable for their actions. They are insulated from public scrutiny. I have sent e-mails to the OSBI website and have never gotten one reply. Isn't it common courtesy to at least respond once in 6 months? Now they are trying to stop the press from having access to autopsy reports. I have quit following that story. What is the use of keeping current on events that involve the OSBI? The OSBI and the powers that be will twist and turn things so that any story released will make them look spotless and worthy of praise.
When Skyla and Taylor were murdered. I had faith that OSBI would handle the case in a professional and well articulated manner. I no longer feel that way.
I have recently been accepted into a professional organization of criminal profilers. (I am not a profiler but due to my educational background and the fact that I am currently taking classes in profiling, I was accepted into the organization) The one thing that the fellow members have taught me is that it is very important that someone "police the police" Meaning, the beat cops, the detectives, the CSI employees and the crime lab technicians. (To name a few). No one is above answering to a higher authority.
What I want to know is who does the OSBI answer to?
Who makes sure the OSBI is following every tip and lead on every case?
Who makes sure systems are in place?
Who makes sure systems are being followed?
Now as for the socio-economic status of Skyla, Taylor and Aja. The fact that the very publicly viewed crimes shows (Nancy Grace etc....) did not cover the cases in great detail, speaks volumes.
"This agency is insulated from public scrutiny, and I'm beginning to wonder if that's a serious concern here," Morrissette said.
The above bolded / underlined words are the exact ones I have thought myself. The OSBI is not held accountable for their actions. They are insulated from public scrutiny. I have sent e-mails to the OSBI website and have never gotten one reply. Isn't it common courtesy to at least respond once in 6 months? Now they are trying to stop the press from having access to autopsy reports. I have quit following that story. What is the use of keeping current on events that involve the OSBI? The OSBI and the powers that be will twist and turn things so that any story released will make them look spotless and worthy of praise.
When Skyla and Taylor were murdered. I had faith that OSBI would handle the case in a professional and well articulated manner. I no longer feel that way.
I have recently been accepted into a professional organization of criminal profilers. (I am not a profiler but due to my educational background and the fact that I am currently taking classes in profiling, I was accepted into the organization) The one thing that the fellow members have taught me is that it is very important that someone "police the police" Meaning, the beat cops, the detectives, the CSI employees and the crime lab technicians. (To name a few). No one is above answering to a higher authority.
What I want to know is who does the OSBI answer to?
Who makes sure the OSBI is following every tip and lead on every case?
Who makes sure systems are in place?
Who makes sure systems are being followed?
Now as for the socio-economic status of Skyla, Taylor and Aja. The fact that the very publicly viewed crimes shows (Nancy Grace etc....) did not cover the cases in great detail, speaks volumes.