Well, at least we know how some of that still huge, even if grossly overstated retainer, is being spent lol....JUST kidding (sorta).
If LE did not know about this guy before today (well before today -- like from day 1 or at least the first week), I may make my first climb onto the fence ever. Although if I were on a jury I couldn't convict her based on what *we* know, I've always been fairly confident in the investigation and that LE knows WAY more than we know.
Surely it wouldn't be great leap to find out if there were maint. types on campus that day -- especially for the specific purpose of mowing the entire soccer field. That's true, I think, even assuming one (or many) people didn't see him. Plus, even if LE didn't think of it immediately on their own, you would also think that the trained searchers that were there right in the beginning would have noticed that the entire soccer field had just been mowed and mention it to someone.
Once someone thought of asking, it would be super easy to track this guy down and find out for sure if/when he was there -- this guy is a gov't employee. And then, if it turns out that none of those employees were supposed to be at Skyline that day, you've got a fairly short list of very suspicious persons, imo.
I hope LE has known about this guy all along, and it's his testimony that they wanted to corroborate -- i.e., that the vehicle the *other* witness claims to have seen in two locations along the access road, was NOT th's truck, but this guy's truck. And I hope that's what they were trying to do b/c they believe they know where th's truck actually was/or wasn't and don't want any conflicting testimony. Although one would think that his vehicle (assuming it was a gov't vehicle he was in) would have conspicuous markings that an eye-witness would notice.
whew...anyway, like I said, if LE didn't know about this guy 'til know, I do believe I'll be on the fence and that there's something entirely different going on between TH and DDS. jmoo