JudgeJudi
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 26, 2014
- Messages
- 10,620
- Reaction score
- 31,350
RSBM - Tortoise transcription
In the result the court finds the accused has not shown good cause why he should be allowed to call the expert witnesses before testifying himself. The application as such in terms of S.151 (b) (i) is dismissed.
P Botha: As the court pleases my lord. But as I have indicated in the course of my argument and your lordship will no doubt recall, my client has now placed on record to the effect he'd made a decision that at this stage he does not intend to testify, and we will attend on 9th with your lordship's leave to call the witnesses that we intend to call.
Desai said HvB had not shown good cause why he should testify last and dismissed the application.
Could someone please advise if I've misunderstood something along the way. I thought Botha still left it open as to whether or not HvB would testify in spite of Desai's ruling.
Prime, I think we're getting the posts confused. Botha made an application for the 3 experts to testify first and Desai dismissed this application. However, Botha said that "at this stage he does not intend to testify". Desai reminded him that the court may make an adverse inference if this were to occur. Have I misunderstood what you're saying?
As things stand at the moment, the court will only use the initial statement. The plea explanation can only be used if he changes his mind and does testify, and Galloway said this as she must be able to cross-examine him on it.