Tweets:
Jenna Etheridge (@JennaEtheridge) | Twitter
The Western Cape High Court will this morning hear an application by Jason Rohde for bail, pending the appeal of his conviction in the SCA. Rohde, who is not present in court, was sentenced to an effective 20 year's for his wife's murder.
@TeamNews24
William King SC is standing in for defence advocate Graham van der Spuy, who is understood to be ill.
King: It would seem that the issue of bail today has to be considered in light of the SCA granting leave to appeal and also the prejudice Mr Rohde has claimed will land on his and his family’s head if bail isn’t granted to him.
King highlights the reasoning in a case which dealt with a similar bail application. In that matter, accused wasn't a flight risk, was granted bail previously and complied with bail for numerous years.
King: "It appears that this was a crime of passion which was then covered up by the accused and made to look like a suicide. The murder came about, not as a premeditated incident but as a crime of passion where there was interaction between the two."
King: This is an all or nothing situation where Rohde will either serve his sentence or be acquitted on appeal. One must look at the risk of flight.
King: If a person has to weigh up 20 years in jail or run overseas, deep into the never never, that is the risk that the court system faces.
King argues that in this case, Rohde has a third option which mitigates the chance of flight if bail is granted. "Argue the appeal, be acquitted and carry on with life".
Judge Salie-Hlophe asks King if there are new facts for this bail application. He replies that she found there was no prospects of success on appeal. But the SCA reconsidered and said there are prospects. "This is central to any bail application."
Judge Salie-Hlophe points out the SCA didn't specifically say on which basis it granted Jason leave to appeal his conviction.
Judge Salie-Hlophe says she searched far and wide to find legal principles which ensconced the present case. And there was a lot of "craftmanship" on her part with some principles. She says maybe the SCA granted leave to appeal on this basis.
Judge Salie-Hlophe says the legal principles she employed will have to be pronounced on by a higher court- the SCA will either endorse, reject, recraft or polish them.
King on the issue of prejudice: The State has produced evidence that the SCA matter is likely to be heard in the first or second term of next year. "[Jason] would have served over a year and a half of his sentence which, if acquitted, he can’t recover."