This article raised more questions for Supt Sayers IMO. Here , Phoebe's Mother refutes his assertion that the family did not alert school officials.
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/02/us/02bully.html?pagewanted=1
"Darby OBrien, a friend of the Prince family, said Thursday that Ms. Princes parents had told him that they had twice tried to alert the school and protect their daughter. Anne Prince, the mother, told him that in one case she had contacted a school official in November asking whether this gang of girls was a threat to her daughter, and was told not to worry. The mother said she had contacted the school again in the first week of January as the taunting continued, Mr. OBrien said."
and
"On the afternoon of her death, on Jan. 14, other students said they saw Ms. Prince going into the nurses office, crying. A school official confirmed that Ms. Prince had seen the nurse but said he could not comment on the reasons.
In interviews, some students and parents described bullying incidents that they said were witnessed by teachers. A few times in December and early January, for example, Ms. Prince arrived at a class late and crying; a teacher tried to console her in the hallway and then left her there, said a student who did not want to be identified, citing the criminal proceedings. "
It would appear that Phoebe reached out to the school nurse before she went home and in desperation, took her life.
The poor girl tried.
Sayers whitewash will have to overcome this type of testimony if there are civil suits.
Watching this video of Supt Sayers, I would like to ask him several questions.
http://www.necn.com/04/01/10/South-...ng_newengland.html?blockID=208632&feedID=4206
1. What type of environment are you providing South Hadley's children when a student feels comfortable enough to "walk into" a classroom in session with a teacher...where apparently she does not belong...and direct obscenities at another student? What type of supervision prevails in that school that an act this BRAZEN is undertaken apparently with the confidence that it will cause little consequence to the Bully?
2. Sayers claims this bully AND "other students involved" were called in to be "disciplined" in this video:
[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bq67xOY-9dk&feature=player_embedded[/ame]
So who were these "other students?" Did kids in the class yell out their approval and join the Bully in demeaning Phoebe in her class? Or were other students in the Hall supporting the intrusion into the classroom? If so, you don't need a PHD in Education to see you might have a larger problem here.
What was the discipline? Was there ANY follow-up in the week ahead...the last week of Phoebe's life?
3. In another video, he reports that on the same day, a teacher overheard another group in the cafeteria speaking about Phoebe in (his words) "unflattering ways" and was so moved by these "unflattering words" that these students were also called in. And then what...nothing? Nothing?
How can school officials NOT be aware NOW, after two separate incidents in one day, that they have a situation that needs watching? If they were NOT aware...why not? It's THEIR JOB to be aware and provide a safe environment for students.
4. Even if we accept as true that these two incidents were the entire body of knowledge that the school had...would this not at least call for an increased vigilance by school officials IN THAT LAST WEEK? Could they have given Phoebe just ONE WEEK of increased monitoring to see what her situation truly was? Did they call Phoebe in and speak to her privately? Did they alert her Mother? Did they alert staff to be aware that Phoebe appeared to be targeted by two separate groups? It is the job of that Supt and all school officials to provide a safe environment for students. They knew on Jan 7 that school was not "safe" for Phoebe. What specific actions did they take to monitor the situation in the last week of her life?
5. On the day she dies , Phoebe was swarmed in the library as she tried to study. The Supt says ..it's a large library. Alright then. But if they knew on Jan 7, that two groups of kids were targeting Phoebe. Did they alert the rest of Phoebe's teachers to the harassment? If not why not?
Were any of the KNOWN bullies in the group around Phoebe in the library? Are they saying an experienced teacher can be in a room where a young girl is surrounded and harassed and not have any clue this is transpiring? How attentive IS this teacher? Her job, I assume, is to supervise the library...big room or not. How could this happen under proper supervision?
Phoebe endured a death by a thousand cuts. Sayers et al. seem to be trying to say that the problem was her instability, not the school in any way. He should be reminded that no healthy person dies from one cut...but unrelenting cuts will destroy the healthiest among us. South Hadley High, under his supervision, providing the longstanding "cutting ground" for Phoebe Prince.