http://cbs2chicago.com/westsuburbanbureau/drew.peterson.court.2.612298.html
Judge denies return of guns/cars.
Judge denies return of guns/cars.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Thank GOD. I'm especially happy that the guns won't be returned. Why not the cars though? I'm hoping they are being held as evidence, if that's possible.
They're not returning the cars either.
And I will completely agree with you! I think LE does too since a Judge ruled not to release his cars. I'm suspecting there may be more in them than just scrapes off a blue container.I bet MF knows a lot more than he is saying on Greta.
A grand jury leak?
Who leaked what to whom?
DP is the one blabbing to the media.
Initially, Drew Peterson was using a car loaned to him by a friend.How many people don't know friends/relatives who could lend them a car in an emergency? And DrewP has the resources to rent a vehicle. Instead he doesn't appear to have any vehicle since Stacy's Dad took his motorcycle back.
Though I do have to wonder. I have read somewhere that DrewP had his own motorcycle, and that the cycle hasn't been seen since shortly after Stacy's disappearance. Which to me says it is stashed somewhere. So who is to say that he doesn't have a rental car stashed somewhere?
The minivan Drew had been driving was a rental. I think Drew needs to go buy a new vehicle if he is that worried about his children. After all, he DOES have the money for it! Oh, wait...maybe he will need Steve to make the purchase for him since much of his available cash mysteriously ended up in his account. : )
Can't believe Steve C didn't run right over with his car keys and say here you go Drew.
I wonder if they made him sign something regarding this, when they paid him for the story?didn't know where else to post this - but this seems like a good place as any...
I was reading an article from the Chicago Tribune that someone posted earlier (link: http://www.chicagotribune.come/news/local/chi-peterson 14dec14,0,5459334.story? ) -hope that works! anyway...
quote from article:
Mims said his contract with the National Enquirer prohibited him from commenting about the article. "I can't say anything. If I say anything, the Enquirer is going to sue me. I cannot confirm or deny anything that was in it."
hmmm.... Interesting comment about the Natl Enquirer - NEVER heard that before!! LOL! and I'm sure Jams would have used that excuse!!![]()