This thread is a perfect candidate for a poll. I'm just not seeing it.
I guess what I was trying to say is GA and the lot manager originally saw a basketball shaped stain in the middle of the trunk, which I was thinking would be more plate size. Then later the ALS test showed a stain that could be imagined as a child in a fetal position, which sounds a lot bigger than a plate. If the shape changed or grew in size, would it have been possibly by cleaning the trunk?
More proof of tampering with evidence by the A's.....
Is there a photo of the trunk with this stain?
I could not see it.
Yeah, there are links back a couple of pages in this thread.
Actually, on page 3 of this thread, there is speculation that those pictures posted earlier are not actual crime scene photos, but photos posted by a member to demostrate the size of the trunk.
Is there a photo of the trunk with this stain?
I could not see it.
I suppose the shape could have changed or grown in size by cleaning (fluids bleeding out like ink) - but I also think with cleaning the ALS could pick up the cleaning solvents as well. I know that bleach will show up under a black light, as will urine and semen. Really the issue here probably is what was visible to the naked eye vs. what is seen under ALS.
Sadly it doesn't even matter because their victim status has blinded LE (and others) to their true nature. They will not be held accountable for anything they have done. IMO
It's not speculation, it's definite. The pictures where you can actually see anything are posted by members and are of different Sunfire trunks.
But there is one picture we have of KC's trunk. It is grainy and black & white and has "A" and "B" evidence markers showing. The links to "" are of the correct photo.
Well, if GA did find Caylee's body (which could have been in the empty wheel well) and dropped it off on Suburban road, I would think he would want it hidden in plain sight. He probably knew she would be arrested and keeping Caylee's body close by would also allow someone to find her while KC was in jail, thus confusing chain of custody, or perhaps allow contamination of the scene, which he knew would be useful.
It might also explain why information or "rumors" might have been leaked to strategic local people who would try to look for her. To me, GA had every reason to want Caylee's body found quickly and KC and JB could have no possible interest in finding it as long as a kidnapping scenario could be drawn out as long as possible. In fact, it would be a strike against KC if the body were found at all, since that would elevate "missing" to "murdered".
If KC confessed to an accident while she was in jail, which he may have been hoping she'd do when he tried to set up the visit with detectives on Aug 14, when JB was safely out of town, then she would not get a long sentence. If not, then he may have thought it would be difficult to prove KC placed her there. She was clearly angry at her parents in the jail visit when they asked for help in finding her. Almost as if she was saying "why are you asking ME?".
I think there is enough of a possibility this occurred to make it an alternate scenario; I haven't made up my mind yet altogether, however. And we just may never know the truth. As we all know, the truth and the Anthonys are strangers. Maybe more like enemies.
Well, I looked and as bad as I wanted to see something incriminating, I didn't see anything. Not to say it isn't there, just, I don't see it on my monitor with my eyes. I never saw anything at the disposal site either, no skull, no books so I'm not a very good judge on these things.
Link to LIBS test:
http://www.wftv.com/download/2008/1024/17794795.pdf
LIBS was done on the surface of the trunk liner. It tests for inorganic compounds actually on the the liner. The air test was done on vapors released from the trunk liner after it was closed up in a bag.
Dr. Vass mentioned to YM in an email he detected pinene and limonene in the air samples. He asked about any swampy areas. I'm thinking more along the lines of orange cleaner. It contains limonene, a powerful degreaser. Given that VFAs are fatty acids, orange cleaner would dissolve them. Would it eliminate them? not sure.
IMO on the orange cleaner
Great post... your theory on orange cleaner is food for thought...
Reading over the LIBS report I noted the following:
page 27 states (paraphrasing) post-mortem interval is best determined using volatile fatty acids or VFAs (mentioned in the article I posted) but can be done in a crude fashion using inorganic elements. Moreover, it says results are preliminary. VFA analysis needs to be completed. Hopefully we will see more about testing done on the stain in the next doc dump next week. (Unless I missed it I did not see it in the last sets released.)
(above is my interpretation of page 27.)
http://www.wftv.com/download/2008/1024/17794795.pdf
http://www..com/2009/09/view-picture-of-stain-shaped-like-childs-body-in-casey-anthonys-trunk/
the original has the "A" & "B" Markers and is black & white
Actually, on page 3 of this thread, there is speculation that those pictures posted earlier are not actual crime scene photos, but photos posted by a member to demostrate the size of the trunk.
It's not speculation, it's definite. The pictures where you can actually see anything are posted by members and are of different Sunfire trunks.
But there is one picture we have of KC's trunk. It is grainy and black & white and has "A" and "B" evidence markers showing. The links to "" are of the correct photo.
I can see what COULD be the outline of a child, but after years of investigating the paranormal, I am simply chalking this one up to matrixing.
[/B]
How about the kitten? Did you see the kitten? :winko:
As it turned out those of us who admitted to seeing nothing, were the ones who saw what was there. Those first pictures, were pictures of nothing. No book, no skull pix, just leaves, lots and lots of decomposing leaves. Sorry HP, no kitty's either... Oh there was that 1 piece of yellow paper that that went thru several possible incarnations for a few days...
The outline is being seen by a professional, this is what he does. And even he said it must be set up with specific shading on the computer. I think GA seeing an imperfect circular shape in natural but overcast light, doesn't mean it was was a different shape, size or anything than he described. Under the conditions he was looking at it. When I looked at the picture at Caylee Daily, I thought I saw the outline, but it turned out to be opposite of the outline that someone drew on there. Who's right? IDK...
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~