yuzu-lemon
New Member
- Joined
- Apr 18, 2013
- Messages
- 84
- Reaction score
- 0
wow, i thought of everything but that, thanks
I had to search google to figure out what bbm, iirc, ita, and moo meant. :crosseyed:
Websleuths needs a glossary "IMO".
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
wow, i thought of everything but that, thanks
I'd like to tell him what I think about drunk drivers.:waiting:
I had to search google to figure out what bbm, iirc, ita, and moo meant. :crosseyed:
Websleuths needs a glossary "IMO".
GOOD THINGS come to those who wait. :takeabow:
I had to search google to figure out what bbm, iirc, ita, and moo meant. :crosseyed:
Websleuths needs a glossary "IMO".
I saw on twitter someone made the coolest shirt for verdict day
On the front the blue Justice For Travis ribbon
on the back ...one large word....
"Served"
I like the confidence. I too believe justice will be served, and the jury will come back with murder one.
You and me both!
Don't even get me started on Drunk Drivers, or any type of distracted drivers!
This confuses me as well. But someone upthread stated it may be the level of the charge for the DUI.
I don't know if 'charged' with a DUI would be diffferent for a juror than 'convicted' of a DUI. Like JA, innocent until proven guilty, so can't be held against him just yet. IDK. Its a head thumper for me why the wait since I would think a breathalyzer would have shown guilt/innocence?
Not sure!
K
What's interesting about ALV's testimony that she "assumed" Travis was looking at *advertiser censored* on the computer is the following: we all know, after watching JA on the stand for 18+ days, that she would not have said something fairly non-specific like "Travis was looking at *advertiser censored* of little boys." JA is very descriptive and would have described the incident like she did on the stand -- walking into the bedroom, he's on the bed, has photos, one flutters to the floor. There is no way ALV was left with so little information about this ALLEGED turning point in JA's and Travis' relationship that she had to make assumptions. Also, if she is so technologically ignorant as she claims, it seems to me she would have assumed he was looking at magazines.
Imagine you are on the jury, and that you have to convince a fellow juror to find JA guilty of premeditated murder. You only know what the jury knows.
This juror doesn't believe that JA stole her grandparent's gun, doesn't want to believe that JA went there to kill Travis, does believe that Travis was at least very verbally abusive, and thus probably he had hurt JA physically- at least once, even if it didn't happen the way she said it did.
To this juror, it seems plausible that JA simply snapped-- because of her BPD, or for whatever reason, but in response to something Travis did or said. If JA had gone there to kill him, says the juror, she would have killed him sooner and done so without taking any chance at all that he could fight back.
What would you tell this juror?
Opening statements being played on True TV right now
JM: Mr. Alexander did not die calmly. The Medical Examiner will explain the various defensive wounds. That means he was fighting for his life, trying to defend against someone with a knife.
I had never seen these first 15 minutes, they are always missing from the tapes of opening statements I have seen. I think the jury was with Juan Martinez every second of the trial, after this OS. Powerful!!!
-------"Juan stuck with issues/lies that he could definitively prove, and the more important issue was the fact she had pics of herself with her new hair color the day before the murder, proving that she lied on the stand, and showing premeditation."
This is an issue I am not clear on. We already know her hair was dark from the naked pics. So what does the new photos from the day before tell us?
geevee - ITA! I've been thinking the same thing! I've posted about those pics on the "sequence of events" thread and I'm still not convinced that they were taken on June 4th. I think that the PA may not be convinced either but I don't think it will come out in trial as it just "muddies the water"...Maybe we'll find out more once the trial is over???It shows us that her hair was blonde on June 2nd when she rented the Ford Focus in Redding (testimony from the car rental guy) and it was dark brown on June 3rd the afternoon before she left for Mesa.
Just realized something, her hair in the nudie pics looks closer in color to the pic with her sister than the new, dark brown pics of her in the rental car. Hmmm...
Really? I thought he was very convincing. More so than the first time. No wishy-washy-ness. But you know, some jurors may agree with you and that's okay. The jurors can pick whichever version they want. Even with Arias' version it amounts to first degree murder. Going to get a knife after shooting Travis and then stabbing him 29 times is first degree murder.