State rests rebuttal case - thread #167

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
I can't find the link now but the other day on Twitter there was a powerpoint that Dr G did a presentation about expert witnesses.
 
attachment.php
 

Attachments

  • bored.jpg
    bored.jpg
    102.8 KB · Views: 360
IS the only reason he is here to negate the States witness on when she was liscensed as a Psychiatrists?
 
She's trying to discredit De Marte as inexperienced and shady. Yet De Marte was eminently credible, so good luck with that.
 
You know you have been on this case to long when you sit here and listen to this man go on and on and on to the defense...... only to wait patiently for JM to come out and hit the grand slam questions and blow all this puff puff puff out of the water. Just like ALV.

I heard the defense couldn't get ANYBODY in Az to take this case. Wish the jury knew that little tidbit.
 
JW is blowing it. One can count their clincial hours done under supervision towards the licensing requirement. Demarte was very specific about that.
 
I totally get asking about the witness CV/experience. however, it is plainly obvious that JW is dragging this out. there is no purpose to some of these questions.
It's more than that--JW's questions are specifically intended to contrast his VAST experience to Dr. DeMarte's and to "rebut" some of Dr. D's assertions about her qualifications.
 
So hes not getting paid for being there?

INDONT BELIEVE THAT FOR ONE SECOND

Sent from my 'alternate reality' using my hippocampus

Maybe ALV is getting paid extra and she will donate....
 
Did anyone else see the people yawning on the JA side of the behind JA family? That's how I feel.
 
You know, if the can't the DT went as fast as these threads, we'd have been done a month ago.
 
This is dull. Dr. DeMarte already said that she was able to get her doctorate before they changed the rules. I wonder if the jury is tuned out.
Also.. people don't do this for free. Its either monetary or personal. We all know its personal since he's hooked up with ALV.
 
You know you have been on this case to long when you sit here and listen to this man go on and on and on to the defense...... only to wait patiently for JM to come out and hit the grand slam questions and blow all this puff puff puff out of the water. Just like ALV.

Let's just hope this guy didn't send JA any magazines, books, or other goodies. If so, he's toast. Get off the stand now :)
 
I was watching the Lindsey Lowe sentencing the other day and when they introduced a new expert they just said that they had looked at his credentials and accepted that he was an expert. It saved a lot of time. I wish they would do that here.

Never thought I would say we could learn something from Lindsay Lohan... :what:


but this DT could sure skip this blah blah blah by just announcing creds have been reviewed... and carry on!

:banghead:
 
I'm already prepared for the DT to take up the entire day and give Juan 30 minutes to finish up. I wouldn't even be a problem for him though, but it still makes me angry. Judge needs to give them a time limit - split evenly between defense and prosecution. Seems fair doesn't it?
If JW doesn't give herself any time for redirect, she's going to be totally toasted though. JW under presurre in a redirect won't be a good thing.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
111
Guests online
467
Total visitors
578

Forum statistics

Threads
608,340
Messages
18,237,939
Members
234,347
Latest member
Allira93
Back
Top