Hi RN. Why is this response a "weird" dynamic of this family? At the time, I'm sure they were convinced by BC's adamant response - to the point of a law suit.
If it were my dau - and my Son-I/L responded as vehemently, I'd back my dau - and SIL - and vociferously back claims or statements to get "the infidels" well out of my dau's emotional stress levels.
Seems NC's family also believed BC vehement denials. They'd have backed him to quash ill rumor or ill repute. IMOO - their endorsing his wishes shows NC's family supported BC's actions to preserve the marriage (further support to NC in the long run).
Just my take ...
For the life of me I don't know why the WRAL people can't tweet SOMETHING.
Hi Polk - It's not just this response, which I realize was tongue-in-cheek and not the best example. By a weird dynamic, I mean it seems the parents were very involved in the lives of their adult children. It seems they knew everything, were still lending them money, and their input/approval was needed for most aspects (such as paintings).
Also, when Mrs. Rentz testified. She testified to phone conversations NC had with Mr. Rentz, but when referring to both of them she stated "we" and testified to it as though it was first hand knowledge...even when she was not on the phone call.
Mrs. Rentz also testified several times things like "we told her to xyz". Again, it's considering her and her husband as one person. I also thought it was presumptive to tell an adult child what to do, rather than listen and offer advice if it is requested.
NC's family is clearly in a great deal of pain, and they were obviously very close. I'm not belittling that in any way. I simply noticed they seem to be VERY involved in each other's lives.
FBI special agent Gregory Johnson is going to tell the jury how they check the computers. the FBI does not want us to know how they do it. ancient Chinese secret
DO NOT POST PICTURES OR NAME MINORS, PLEASE.
Salem
For the life of me I don't know why the WRAL people can't tweet SOMETHING.
FBI special agent Gregory Johnson is going to tell the jury how they check the computers. the FBI does not want us to know how they do it. ancient Chinese secret
Well I hope our snoops are taking detailed notes then, perhaps we can sell 'em on ebay. :great::floorlaugh::banghead:
Heh heh, cody. After all the big secrecy (understood & respected) I was actually jealous FD might go in, lol. (And, fwiw, right after posting that my puter frozeup on me! He who laughs last...?). May not agree on BC's guilt, but humor is to be shared generously in here, methinks!
Hi Polk - It's not just this response, which I realize was tongue-in-cheek and not the best example. By a weird dynamic, I mean it seems the parents were very involved in the lives of their adult children. It seems they knew everything, were still lending them money, and their input/approval was needed for most aspects (such as paintings).
Also, when Mrs. Rentz testified. She testified to phone conversations NC had with Mr. Rentz, but when referring to both of them she stated "we" and testified to it as though it was first hand knowledge...even when she was not on the phone call.
Mrs. Rentz also testified several times things like "we told her to xyz". Again, it's considering her and her husband as one person. I also thought it was presumptive to tell an adult child what to do, rather than listen and offer advice if it is requested.
NC's family is clearly in a great deal of pain, and they were obviously very close. I'm not belittling that in any way. I simply noticed they seem to be VERY involved in each other's lives.
I can only assume nothing that is being said is worth even tweeting about.