One other thing I took away from from the MFT argument by Kurtz. The judge has essentially ruled that whatever the defense has is the same or equal to what the prosecution has. If the defense brings forth an expert that can show according to our data these files were tampered with and this is how we know, there is no room for the prosecution to turn around and say, well we don't see that in our data.
Yes, Sleuth. I agree that is correct. And, it is possible that is where they were going with this all along. That would be interesting, wouldn't it?