BrownRice
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2008
- Messages
- 4,941
- Reaction score
- 18,431
If they proved that the computer was tampered with via Cisco VPN connection while in LE hands then they should be able to tell WHO had a VPN connection to Cisco. It's a Cisco employee who did the tampering in that case. I can definitely see why the Prosection is all over this....I would guess that Brad was deleting items from his computer while it was in LE custody.
That's what I'm thinking -if it's possible. Don't know? But, if that's the case, wouldn't the defense not have this testimony?