calamityjane831
Verified registered nurse
- Joined
- Feb 10, 2012
- Messages
- 1,051
- Reaction score
- 5
I just can't resist. Only if they're wearing a hula skirt.
Good one. lol
I just can't resist. Only if they're wearing a hula skirt.
This is true, I hope they have something, because if this guy keeps dragging this on and has nothing, jury will remember DT is grasping at twigs.DT has a right to put their witness up on the stand to discuss the evidence in this case.
At least he doesn't say "umm" a million times. I know this is cumbersome, but it's important. I wonder if DT called him last night to come in today.
Didn't he say he received this stuff on Nov 10, 2006? Where has he been all this time?
Of course, he hasn't made a point yet (has he?). I feel like I'm in ballet class with all these positions. And it seems he would be a photography expert as well. He sure does like to hear himself speak.
I'm thinking that he really doesn't add anything to the case. He's being used just to try to confuse the jury and add another layer of speculation.
That juror that I saw nodding off when they played JLY's video testimony must be in a coma by now.
This is true, I hope they have something, because if this guy keeps dragging this on and has nothing, jury will remember DT is grasping at twigs.
Was it the one in the upper right? I saw her doze off yesterday during HC's extra-LONG cross.
This is like Henry Lee. All of the evidence showed OJ did it, but he was a sort of mystical character and his famous "something wrong" helped lead to a jury nullification verdict.
I thought they indicated yesterday that they had 2 witnesses for today and that was it. This is their 2nd witness today, so I'm assuming the's the last one.
When I DVR something and the inevitable car or foot chase breaks out, I skip forward to the capture. So, instead of cutting to the chase, can we please cut to the capture?