State vs Jason Lynn Young 2-28-12

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
I'm trying to keep it off my list about the accident. Because on one hand I feel it was on purpose and the other an accident. The life insurance just prior to the accident, just doesn't sit right with me. Especially because still not long after, MY was brutally murdered in her own home.

IF a LE officer isn't looking for an accident and approaches the investigation as an accident, he can over-look things. This was a local boy who said it was an accident and his wife didn't dispute it. He basically had no choice but to say it was an accident. Another investigator MAY have said it was questionable, but since there was no reason to, it was deemed an accident.

I don't think the LE necessarily intentionally lied. HE just may have misread the evidence. IMHO, it COULD have been intentional.

There are laws against insurance fraud for a reason. It happens all the time. As a matter of fact, JY was plotting to do 'insurance fraud' with the heating system in their home.:(

JMHO
fran

I honestly believe it was a accident.. I also think the jury will see it as that....
 
Morning.......:seeya:

How is it going with Pat Young?
I can't believe she is still on the stand.

I am having trouble with audio at WRAL and IS has the Rutgers case on.
 
IMHO, they're questioning her about what was missing to point out how JY didn't help the investigation to solve the brutal murder of his wife and unborn son. IF he had, he would have gone through the home and looked for anything missing.

After all, if it WAS for burglary and stuff was stolen, that is quite often how the perp is caught. He fences the stuff and it's located and then traced back to the murderer.

LE had MF tell him, that first night, that the first 24 hours was a window of opportunity that would close, without any leads. They needed his input to help them solve his wife/child's murder.

Now we see she knew long before it was reported, there were things allegedly missing from the murder scene.

This testimony is not lost on the jury.

JMHO
fran
 
So, in all these months, JY never told Le that anything was missing from the home. He left it to his mother to do that, right? Even if it would have pointed to a robbery in the home, he never gave them a list of missing items? Not even in writing?
 
So, she decided these items were missing, Jason couldn't talk about it. How did she know that JY or MY didn't do something with these things?
 
For those who are in a southern cooking mood and following the Young testimony, here is your recipe for strawberry pretzel salad

http://allrecipes.com/recipe/strawberry-pretzel-salad-2/

That looks good! And here I was thinking it was an actual salad! I make a strawberry salad that is spinach leaves, strawberries, blueberries, cranberries, walnuts, a little feta cheese & poppy seed dressing... that's what I thought she was referring to... silly me!
 
She liked the detectives (Blackwell & Spivey) and talked to them several times, but was 'angry' at investigators and never told them about missing items for 6 months...and not until they visited her again. Mmmmkay. That makes sense. :waitasec:
 
Teens moon all of the time. Now, mooning grandmother is not exactly the smartest thing IMO

Like I said I do not know any that would do that, they are respectable kids, yes they do make mistakes and do dumb things but mooning is not one of them.
 
So the trooper is going to get up on the stand and just lie, lie and lie.. Taking a chance of ruining his LE & military career... You know all those ribbons.... Dont believe it..
The guy told the truth... It was an accident... I believe the jury will feel the same way..

The military officer/highway patrolman on the stand yesterday didn't lie (nobody said he did). His partner is the brother of the friend of JY (and the brother is also a deputy). I don't think anybody is accusing the guy from yesterday of lying.
 
So, she decided these items were missing, Jason couldn't talk about it. How did she know that JY or MY didn't do something with these things?

Exactly! Very possible things could have been re-gifted and/or sold by MY if the jewelry wasn't her style. I do it all the time! And honestly if my house was robbed today I wouldn't be able to tell what is & isn't missing other than my wedding ring & watch & favorite earrings... no idea what's up in my jewelry drawer.
 
I'm trying to keep it off my list about the accident. Because on one hand I feel it was on purpose and the other an accident. The life insurance just prior to the accident, just doesn't sit right with me. Especially because still not long after, MY was brutally murdered in her own home.

IF a LE officer isn't looking for an accident and approaches the investigation as an accident, he can over-look things. This was a local boy who said it was an accident and his wife didn't dispute it. He basically had no choice but to say it was an accident. Another investigator MAY have said it was questionable, but since there was no reason to, it was deemed an accident.

I don't think the LE necessarily intentionally lied. HE just may have misread the evidence. IMHO, it COULD have been intentional.

There are laws against insurance fraud for a reason. It happens all the time. As a matter of fact, JY was plotting to do 'insurance fraud' with the heating system in their home.:(

JMHO
fran

I agree, fran. How many times are things re-evaluated once the timeline continues and something else happens. First name that comes to mind is Drew Peterson. When current wife goes missing, the previous wife's death is looked at again.
 
Why wait to report things missing that could point to a robbery?????????????

as someone new to the case/trial I have a huge problem with this (as well as talking to police about anyone that would have wanted to harm her re: MY's sister's testimony at the beginning of the PCIC)
 
I'm convinced the PT or their helpers read here yesterday... he is covering a LOT of the things we said yesterday he should have been covering all along. Now on the list of things PY claims were missing from the house and how would she possibly know since she rarely made it to Raleigh.


I often thought that as well.
I wonder if the defense does too.

:confused:
 
So the trooper is going to get up on the stand and just lie, lie and lie.. Taking a chance of ruining his LE & military career... You know all those ribbons.... Dont believe it..
The guy told the truth... It was an accident... I believe the jury will feel the same way..

I believe he saw his friend in a car accident, and investigated as if his friend was in a car accident, which is something anyone would do. He had no knowledge of their marital problems, he had no knowledge of the affairs, he had no knowledge of the life insurance policies, he investigated a friend's accident...not a future wife murder's accident.

Not blaming the guy, it's just what it is, it's human nature. If he knew about the marital issues, if he knew about the affairs, if he knew about everything else happening in their lives, the investigation may have proved other than an accident, imo.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
157
Guests online
273
Total visitors
430

Forum statistics

Threads
609,620
Messages
18,256,213
Members
234,707
Latest member
Tristessa1066
Back
Top