Thank you! Those cases are kind of blurred together for me now.
You are welcome, very simiiar in some aspects, that's for sure..
Thank you! Those cases are kind of blurred together for me now.
My take on the injuries is that they were a result of both fist and weapon, with several injuries being described as caused by fists or hands. The ME could not say if gloves were worn during the attack ... no evidence of gloves on any of the injuries.
It seems like the suspect should have had some bruising on at least one hand, or somewhere, since there was a struggle.
but so far it doesn't seem like much of a struggle (I am watching this for the first time)..
to me it seems like overkill.
it seems to me like she was more than likely unconscious or dead from the first blow and than repeatedly struck after that...
which sounds more like rage/overkill which also indicates someone that knew her.
and I don't necessarily think there would have to be marks on hands of the perp for this to happen.
but that is just my perspective from today/thus far
My take on the injuries is that they were a result of both fist and weapon, with several injuries being described as caused by fists or hands. The ME could not say if gloves were worn during the attack ... no evidence of gloves on any of the injuries.
It seems like the suspect should have had some bruising on at least one hand, or somewhere, since there was a struggle.
Jason's not even looking at the jury's reactions. He's staring downward, trying to stay awake.
You'd think a guy on trial for his life would be more attentive. IF this were me and I was innocent, I'd be in tears. But I guess it's because I'm a woman. Yet, I KNOW men have just as strong emotions.
JMHO
fran
Do we know who the next witness is going to be?
I heard the Judge say something about it being brief.
but so far it doesn't seem like much of a struggle (I am watching this for the first time)..
to me it seems like overkill.
it seems to me like she was more than likely unconscious or dead from the first blow and than repeatedly struck after that...
which sounds more like rage/overkill which also indicates someone that knew her.and I don't necessarily think there would have to be marks on hands of the perp for this to happen.
but that is just my perspective from today/thus far
I'm curious where the idea comes from that rage/degree of violence is an indication the victim knew her attacker? Thanks.
but so far it doesn't seem like much of a struggle (I am watching this for the first time)..
to me it seems like overkill.
it seems to me like she was more than likely unconscious or dead from the first blow and than repeatedly struck after that...
which sounds more like rage/overkill which also indicates someone that knew her.
and I don't necessarily think there would have to be marks on hands of the perp for this to happen.
but that is just my perspective from today/thus far
For Otto,
From last nite's thread, the reference to the rifle came in through MF's testimony, we had never heard that before.
And, CY's shoe in the master bed?
I will find the photo and link it.
I'm curious where the idea comes from that rage/degree of violence is an indication the victim knew her attacker? Thanks.
Thanks ... I'm listening to the testimony when I can, but missing lots of it too.
Did the prosecution present motive in this trial or the previous one?