JTF has mentioned this multiple times, but I think it's an important point that is easy to miss.
Even
IF one can make the argument that someone else must have also been at the crime scene to leave those size 10 Franklin shoe prints, that does not absolve JY from being the murderer.
You
still have shoe prints from shoes that will be proven that JY owned, admits owning, receipts show when purchased, they weren't old shoes, yet he claims his wife gave them away to Goodwill. How can anyone
reasonably make the argument that someone else, someone with the exact same type and size of JY's Hush Puppy shoes is a perpetrator of the murder, but yet it wasn't JY?
And here's the important point: if one determines that was JY making those shoe prints in size 12, Hush Puppy Orbitals, even if you believe there must have been a 2nd perp there...
JY is STILL guilty of 1st degree murder!
As I joked to JTF yesterday, it doesn't matter if a clown car filled with multiple little people came into the house, that still doesn't remove JY's bloody shoe prints from the scene, and he would still be guilty of 1st degree murder if he was there, no matter who else joined him or how much help he had.
- Hired someone to do a hit for him? (still guilty of 1st degree murder)
- Had a 'friend' help him out? (still guilty of 1st degree murder)
- Conspired with someone to help kill his wife? (still guilty of 1st degree murder)