I didn't know you can outgrow mental illness? :waitasec:
Not being snarky but that is a strong statement you made. IMO and I'm not a psychologist nor a psychiatrist, if someone is diagnosed with mental illness especially psychosis and/or bi-polar, they should be on medication for life.
bbm...What does a mentally ill person look like?
BBM
Me. I have bi-polar disorder and I've never once thought about hurting another person for something they did to me. There are varying degrees of bi-polar disorder and some turn the depressive stage inward and others outward. I wasn't on medication for it for approx. 40 years and since I've been on it my manic levels have pretty much evened out, except that I still get very depressed at times. The manic phases have been curbed more than the depressive phases.
Just because Damien is bi-polar it doesn't make him a murderer. It P.O.'s me to no end when jerks try to use it as an excuse for crimes. Bi-polar disorder doesn't stop you from knowing right from wrong. The fact that so many try to use it makes it seem like it might be true. Repeat a lie enough and it becomes truth. JMO
I am not 100% sure who supported the release. IIRR, The 3 boys families included step and biological parents, so off top of my head, I wouldn't like to say. Perhaps more information will be forthcoming, but obviously Steve Branch and the Moore family did not support the release. At one time I did hear that Rick Murray, Pamela Hobbs and J M Byers had doubts about the convictions, but whether or not they supported the actual releases, I do not know. I am afraid I cannot help you there more than that.
Yes. The case and yesterday's events certainly seem to provoke a strong reaction in people.
In the 48 Hours I linked Pamela Hobbs says she believes her ex husband could have done it. He has some holes in his story that are interesting. In Pamela Hobbs interview she says that Terry would whip the kids with a belt and make them hold their hands above their heads while he did it.
Then while interviewing Terry he denies he ever did that but in two seconds says that if he did do it he would have them hold their hands above their heads so their hands wouldn't get hurt.
They did not admit guilt and I'm sure you know that.I think you keep repeating it to convince yourself and others that they did.They did not.
Technically, they did. That's what keeps them from being able to sue the state. Verbally they never admitted guilt but as far as state records go they did.
Three weeks ago defense attorneys approached prosecutors seeking the Alford plea option, Prosecutor Scott Ellington of Jonesboro said.
At no time did we make an offer, Ellington said. The offer was made to us.
Arkansas Attorney General Dustin McDaniel was contacted by defense council, and a meeting was arranged, Ellington said.
http://www.paragoulddailypress.com/articles/2011/08/20/top_story/doc4e4fd25dc7d29058784712.txt
____________________________
In light of these circumstances I decided to entertain plea offers that were being proposed by the defense. I NEVER considered ANY arrangement that would negate the verdicts of those two juries. Guilt or Innocence was NEVER ON THE TABLE.
Todays proceeding allows the defendants the freedom of speech to SAY they are innocent, but the FACT is, they just plead GUILTY. I strongly believe that the interests of justice have been served today.
On behalf of the State I have
preserved the verdicts of those juries and averted more prolonged and costly trials and appeals in this case.
http://www.arktimes.com/ArkansasBlo...ecutors-statement-on-west-memphis-3-plea-deal
What difference does that make? The state accepted it.
Since the state "lost" the evidence of blood and mud taken from the fast food restaurant I'd be concerned about more "lost" evidence in any new trial coming up.
If the state truly wants to destroy the evidence that sounds a bit fishy to me.
Here's a good site I stumbled across yesterday. I've only read two pages, the first page and one page of evidence, and it's really interesting.
http://www.jivepuppi.com/jivepuppi_home.html
The testimony of officer Meek is particularly interesting. It's the first page of evidence I've read.
http://www.jivepuppi.com/meek.html
There is a lot of contradictions in her reports from that night versus her testimony in the two trials. In fact in the two trials her testimony varies a lot.