robynhood
New Member
- Joined
- Dec 23, 2009
- Messages
- 1,058
- Reaction score
- 6
Agree, way too much evidence IMHO. And he would not go into detail as to why they are not seeking bail. :lol: He doesn't want to tell the public the Crown has a *****load of direct evidence. Why do I think if Napoleon were alive, he would file a lawsuit against DP for dragging his name through the mud or impersonation; maybe identity theft?! :floorlaugh:
His lawyer, Deepak Paradkar would not go into detail about the decision against seeking bail, but said trying to achieve release is a very, very onerous task in first-degree murder cases.
There are a lot of tactical reasons why one might not go for bail, because at a bail hearing, [the Crown] might get to present a case which might affect a lot of things, he said,
Mr. Millard, 28, and his co-accused, 26-year-old Mark Smich, are slated to appear in court on Thursday.
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news...lice-continue-to-search-farm/article14239837/
...Thanks that tells a HUGE story...your link...IMO...now go look up PeiLcan LIGHT....on google....another large reason Police have a search warrant FOR AS LONG AS THEY NEED...." certain evidence does not go away".....:facepalm:...robynhood....I feel sick....JmHO