stilettos
Former Member
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2009
- Messages
- 5,832
- Reaction score
- 8
Well dang, if she was I missed that too. Or are you thinking about Crystal?
Pretty sure that debs is right on with it being TN.
Well dang, if she was I missed that too. Or are you thinking about Crystal?
Do you have any links or facts to back up your accusations of Ron is in drug trafficking or has an addiction to anything?
Hello Pondering,
I have quoted the first message to which I responded - the one which you responded to of mine.
Everyone is of course allowed opinions, and I enjoy discussions of opinions. When I read other opinions that differ from mine, I get to think about things from a differing viewpoint.
I do take exception to things being posted as fact that are not. There are people (guests) that come here to read, and might see something like what was posted and think "Wow! Ron is an active drug trafficker?" When that is simply not true. That is why the upstairs is supposed to be for discussion of facts - things that can be backed up with links. That is why several people asked for links after that was posted. There is a private area to discuss rumors and things that cannot be backed up with links.
Anyhow, this is Teresa's thread. We should probably get back on topic.
It is coming up on EIGHT MONTHS that HaLeigh has been missing. I don't know how anyone in her family is dealing with the pain of her being missing. The not knowing. I don't know how families of missing children can handle this day in and day out.
I guess even after eight months of remaining openminded HH, doing extensive research, exploring every feasible angle and countless theories, I'm supposed to ignore where evidence and my conscience lead and take the same moral "high ground" as some here claim, by being blind not only to any concerns or potential risks for Junior, but blind to MC's everchanging and 'unbelievable' stories (or 'inconsistencies,' as we like to call them); blind to inexplicable allegiances; blind to criminal histories; blind to ongoing violent behavior; blind to the chronic excusemaking; blind to family's antics; blind to implied threats; blind to the million little things that don't add up; and blind to anything which might actually shed light on what became of Haleigh because it may implicate TN, RC, MC or someone in the inner sanctum. Afterall each of these has 'victim' status and are thus protected as such and above scrutiny.
I am a victims' advocate and have tremendous empathy and compassion for all victims considered cooperative by LE and have by no means accused anybody, but if that's our policy, then figuring out what happened to the true victim, Haleigh, just went from the top of the list to the bottom of the list. :furious:
arrot:
I think it only is for Teresa. Marie is not berated for not looking for Haleigh, neither is Crystal. I don't care if they live 88 miles away, but like I said LE told the families not to be searching. They told the families not to talk to each other and also told them not to talk to the press which Teresa followed till she got fed up with LE and started talking to the press.
Can someone point me in the direction to read about this? I really did miss it. TIA!!Pretty sure that debs is right on with it being TN.
I do not see how Haleigh is lost. She is at the root of the discussion. Players in this case could be culpable and responsible for her disappearance. We can't sit here all day, every day and only talk about Haleigh. This is a sleuthing forum. People in the case will be discussed and many won't like it; therefore, sometimes it gets heated.
Personally, IMO, none of us are going to find Haleigh. Some are here to just talk, debate and get information because of their interest in crime. Others like to bounce theories and others like to advocate. There are all kinds of dynamics going on here.
Can someone point me in the direction to read about this? I really did miss it. TIA!!
I guess even after eight months of remaining openminded HH, doing extensive research, exploring every feasible angle and countless theories, I'm supposed to ignore where evidence and my conscience lead and take the same moral "high ground" as some here claim, by being blind not only to any concerns or potential risks for Junior, but blind to MC's everchanging and 'unbelievable' stories (or 'inconsistencies,' as we like to call them); blind to inexplicable allegiances; blind to criminal histories; blind to ongoing violent behavior; blind to the chronic excusemaking; blind to family's antics; blind to implied threats; blind to the million little things that don't add up; and blind to anything which might actually shed light on what became of Haleigh because it may implicate TN, RC, MC or someone in the inner sanctum. Afterall each of these has 'victim' status and are thus protected as such and above scrutiny.
I am a victims' advocate and have tremendous empathy and compassion for all victims considered cooperative by LE and have by no means accused anybody, but if that's our policy, then figuring out what happened to the true victim, Haleigh, just went from the top of the list to the bottom of the list. :furious:
arrot:
I do not see how Haleigh is lost. She is at the root of the discussion. Players in this case could be culpable and responsible for her disappearance. We can't sit here all day, every day and only talk about Haleigh. This is a sleuthing forum. People in the case will be discussed and many won't like it; therefore, sometimes it gets heated.
Personally, IMO, none of us are going to find Haleigh. Some are here to just talk, debate and get information because of their interest in crime. Others like to bounce theories and others like to advocate. There are all kinds of dynamics going on here.
At the root of all the discussions is the little girl named Haleigh, none of us have forgot that.
Kiki..my fine feathered friend...what a great post...:blowkiss:
"There are none so blind as those who will not see"...is what I keep coming back too...that's why I think those that post things as fact given their "relationship" with either family...concern me beyond words...I really like the fact that links are to be used up here vs the PL--wish people who had the inside track would either post in the PL or provide a link or something....I honestly take most of what I read here lately with a salt mine....the spinning makes me nutz...MOO JMO and all that..![]()
I do not see how Haleigh is lost. She is at the root of the discussion. Players in this case could be culpable and responsible for her disappearance. We can't sit here all day, every day and only talk about Haleigh. This is a sleuthing forum. People in the case will be discussed and many won't like it; therefore, sometimes it gets heated.
Personally, IMO, none of us are going to find Haleigh. Some are here to just talk, debate and get information because of their interest in crime. Others like to bounce theories and others like to advocate. There are all kinds of dynamics going on here.
At the root of all the discussions is the little girl named Haleigh, none of us have forgot that.
ITA! Great post with good points!
I have said this before, to my knowledge no one has ever solved a case on the internet through message boards. IMO, this case may be close to, if not already solved, they are just gathering the evidence to support their case against the person(s) guilty of harming Haleigh. I could be wrong, but I believe that they know far more than any of us do about everyone involved, directly or indirectly. That's just my thoughts.
I agree. And I also think that we do not know how much pressure the Cummings family are putting on Misty. What people are willing to say publicly and what they say to family members in private are usually two different things.
However, at this point, I think it will be hard for whoever has her to return her, but I don't think they will harm her. I think they were trying to help her, actually.
Such a very true statement. As is usually the case with familys, their displays publicly can contrast much differently than with what actually goes on inside the home.
Maybe they are "keeping their enemy closer" type deal with Misty, they don't want her to have a clue they suspect, as if she knows that she may shut down completely about info or take off. They may gently press her for info, all the while acting unsuspecting of her. We really don't know the reasoning, however we can only guess at what's behind it.