I am not trying to defend these 'two' brothers. I am simply stating that proof is needed to justify the death of anyone.
In the beginning, after the bombings, a man missing man was identified as the bomber. It turned out, this missing young man has had NOTHING to do with this tragedy. On top of that there were two other men/boys named in the attack. Neither <have been proven> to have nothing to do with this as well.
How are we rushing to judgement now? After all the misinformation, can you fault me, for wanting actual proof?