The Argument that Ron and Misty had.

[ilovemew]

RC could not get a hold of misty from 8:30pm till 3:30 am....correct? They had an enourmous fight according to his attorney, yet..

He comes home....his precious child is gone....

...........we see him hours later...loving on his GF. He never stopped walking with his arm tightly wrapped misty.

..........if you knew somebody for 4-5 months and they lose your child, is your body language going to be to hold them all day? He wrapped his arms around her the entire time. What happened to the anger displayed on the 911? His words on the 911 and his actions of loving on his GF do not add up..

Normal reactions would be to start questioning everything and EVERY one. Ron who had enourmous fight with his girlfriend and his child disappears after the fight, does just the opppostie.....hmmm

What possibly could have changed his intense anger with his GF to a loving, kind, protective tone? He tells the crowd not to blame her..it could have happened to anyone of them, WTH!

He was just keeping his enemies close :doh:

 

[Whisperer]

Well, I've said it over and over, but I'll do it again: I don't think the fact that a child disappears while under the care of a parent or a step-parent/significant other necessarily means that the couple should split up because one of them "lost" a child.

Many couples do exactly that...they break-up over the accidental death/loss of a child....a common double tragedy.

 

[ilovemew]

Many couples do exactly that...they break-up over the accidental death/loss of a child....a common double tragedy.

Yes and at the very least you don't marry the person you've only known for a few months who LE says is the key.
It's not like Ron and Misty were an established couple with a long history!!!

 

[Whisperer]

Thank you, mew, I was just going to add that. They only knew each other a few months and appears they bonded over losing Haleigh. It should have been the opposite.

 

[ilovemew]

Thank you, mew, I was just going to add that. They only knew each other a few months and appears they bonded over losing Haleigh. It should have been the opposite.

I think with this "couple" anything normal goes out the window! There is no "normal" dating and going to the movies/dinner. Little notes and flowers. Talking on the phone... basically everything you do to establish a relationship with someone. It seems Ron hand picked her from the bus stop and than moved her in. No time or desire it seems to get to know the other person.

 

[SailorMoon]

Misty was a matter of convenience for Ron. Now...as to why you would marry someone that let your daughter get "stole", I have no idea. I think Misty knows a lot of things about a lot of things. But could she know what happened to Haleigh and not crack??? That's what messes up with her. I don't think she could. But then...maybe she could. Like an unspoken secret. ((heck I don't even remember what the title of the thread is!! It's late and I'm tired!!)

 

[YellowSubmarine]

Well, I've said it over and over, but I'll do it again: I don't think the fact that a child disappears while under the care of a parent or a step-parent/significant other necessarily means that the couple should split up because one of them "lost" a child.

In most circumstances, this may be correct. BUT when the couple has an already volatile relationship, they've only dated for a short time, the girlfriend goes out for three days of drugs and sex, he forces her to babysit as soon as she gets back even though she said she didn't want to, they get into a fight, she is MIA for 7 hours (while in charge of his kids), he feels worried enough to send family to check on them, his daughter ends up missing, her story makes no sense, she's inconsistent. Besides the 911 call, he never questions her. It definitely seems fishy to me. He should have been furious with her. Questioning her. Forcing her to speak to LE. He never did any of this. It could have been "keeping your enemies close", but if he were innocent of any involvement, he should have been raking her over the coals in those first hours/days.

ETA: We can't forget she said she had been in bed, he says the bed wasn't made; she said she'd done laundry, he said there was no detergent in the house -- after all that, instead of questioning her, he marries her. Hmmmmm

 

[elle1919]

I just remembered where I heard about Misty and Ronald having a fight at 8:30 on the night Haleigh went missing. Interesting audio at link from Tim Miller, thought I would share it.

http://www.thesky973.com/pages/5153285.php

 

[elle1919]

Tim Miller describes the emotions of Ronald and Misty( according to RC) upon entering the trailer after work. He repeats that Ronald said Misty was not emotional when he first got there. Link is really worth a listen..

 

[Maryann123]

I just remembered where I heard about Misty and Ronald having a fight at 8:30 on the night Haleigh went missing. Interesting audio at link from Tim Miller, thought I would share it.

http://www.thesky973.com/pages/5153285.php

Very interesting! He believes Ronald, but doesn't understand the rest of Ronald's family. Well, that makes all of us. Why are they going behind her back and saying these things, rather than confronting Misty themselves. The only reason they wouldn't hound her for the truth, is if they already know the truth.

 

[Skully]

After listening again to this phone conversation with TM, I can't figure out why on God's Earth they changed their story and backed Misty up again. I don't get it. What could she know or have said to get them to all turn on TM and change their stories? They can't have it both ways. If Ron and family are involved, they can't push to get Misty to talk, if they are not involved, why do the about face?