At first I thought it might have been something like "you have to know i'm innocent etc" but maybe, he's come up with an idea of how TM might have done it instead. He's tried to convince his counsel to change stories, but they've told him to pull his head in, so he thinks giving that info to the jury is the next best step?
Like he's picked up on the idea that TM could be a potential suspect via a question from prosecution during the last day. He's stolen other ideas previously - the "i half-expected she might come walking in the door any minute", which he's repeated a few times, came from the cop interviewing him the first day at Brookfield
Yes. All make sense.
I had a genuine compassion attack for a moment there and felt for his seemingly innately deprived intellect, but then I remembered his testimony regarding financials. IQ deficit is not the explanation.
Seriously this 'problem' he has (mustn't laugh) must add to other voids which contribute to the narcissistic need to act opposite of what he knows he is.
jmo
I can't explain it or label it and I'm damn sure GBC can't.
Someone can. Fuller? The judge? Juror (wouldn't that be terrific!)
Imagine if the defence have known he was capable of the note passing weeks ago !!
Oh my.