This sounds too convoluted to me though. So the Ramsey's forgot this bowl completely. PR later said she cleaned up, but she was wrong. JBR later wakes up on her own and goes downstairs and ignored the bowl on the table fully and goes and gets even more pineapple from a container. But PR and JR both said she couldn't get gotten into the fridge. So we have to now assume they are both wrong again. Then JBR goes back upstairs and the intruder strikes? This is so many events. It's like at some point we have to just apply Occam's Razor!
It just seems like, honestly, if you think the Ramsey's are innocent, it would be really weird to cherry pick from their own words what really happened. If you guys think they don't know anything about JBR's abilities in the kitchen, how do you think they know much of anything else? How do you decide when the Ramsey's are right and when they've made an innocent mistake?
Let’s say we take a photograph of your table, and then ask you, four months later, to explain everything that you see in the photograph. Would you be able to do it? If you can’t, should we believe that you are lying, or that you simply don’t remember, or remember inaccurately?
I think occam’s razor is going to suggest that you simply don’t remember, or remember inaccurately.
Here are a few, possible and “innocent” explanations for the pineapple:
1) jonbenet eats the pineapple before leaving for the White’s, a quick bite on her way out the door – at least one Boulder expert said that this was possible
2) jonbenet takes a small piece with her when they leave for the White’s, like candy, tucked into a box, a bag, a baggie, a container, a pocket, whatever was handy. She eats it at the Whites or in the car before falling asleep on the way home
3) jonbenet having fallen asleep earlier than usual and having ate little at the White’s, wakes up at home, in bed and hungry and “finds” that stashed or left over piece somewhere in her room. yum, yum.
4) jonbenet, having fallen asleep earlier than usual and having ate little at the White’s, wakes up at home, in bed and hungry and maybe still thinking about Christmas, wanders downstairs and sees the pineapple in the bowl, left there from earlier in the day, and she has a piece, but still tired wanders off back to bed
In most cases with most people we could say that the pineapple would have went from here to there in an hour and a half (the shortest time given by a BPD expert; I generally go with 30 minutes), and in rarer cases with certain people it could have been ingested as early as 4:30 (the longest time given by a BPD expert). But, other experts say that there are too many variables to make a certain determination - onset of illness, excitement/stress, exhaustion/sleep, other items ingested, factors peculiar to the individual, etc. So, even with transition times, we’re just guessing.
It’s a mystery, for sure; but what hasn’t been established is that this mystery has anything to do with the murder.
…
AK