TexMex
Punishment is justice for the unjust.
- Joined
- Apr 26, 2004
- Messages
- 7,615
- Reaction score
- 56
Do you know the name of the vet or of the video?
Dr. Ernie Ward
Do you know the name of the vet or of the video?
When you quit a job, it is called a separation from employment... just thinking as he at that time had just interviewed with CFA.
Question in general, if this case does NOT get the top three charges, will you feel that the jury did not do the right verdict and think of them as the jury with Casey Anthony that they couldn't add all the circumstances to add it all up to know of guilt? Is this going to be an outrage like FAC, or will more folks think it was "iffy: as to the outcome without outrage on the top three (only) verdicts.
Do you know the name of the vet or of the video?
Too many coincidences like that for me to believe Ross is guilty of murder.![]()
How can anyone be sure, whether they knew about FBS or not, unless they are scientists? And I don't think he thought Cooper would still be alive. But I do think he would've been obsessing about it and wanting to make sure, like all murderers.
Legal separation would be related to divorce in that checklist.
If the top three charges were dismissed, I would totally feel it wasn't the right verdict. I find it hard to even talk abt the CA jury. That this jury didn't work on today points to them not being close to a decision. They're either having difficulty reaching agreement or are being thorough and reviewing the evidence meticulously. Or .....
Considering they've re-watched two longer videos and the short one today, taking breaks into account, actual deliberating hours haven't been that long. I'm satisfied they're taking it into next week.
I will be sick if all top three are dismissed, but I'll accept it. I don't think all three will be though, just throwing that in there.I definitely won't think it "iffy".
Just watched the video. Dr. Ernie Ward, on YouTube, under 5 minutes.
Don't agree that's he's a murderer, so also don't believe in your premise he was obsessing over whether his son was for sure dead yet. The only evidence of obsession that day was his entirely verifiable obsession with sexual gratification.
What coincidence? That he uttered something that shows consciousness of guilt? That's not unusual. It's typical of murderers.
Still upsetting no one was in court for Cooper!!
No way.
What if Cooper weren't deceased yet? Then his whole murder plan is foiled and on top of that he'll get prosecuted for child endangerment. And going to the car at lunch with friends leaves a trail of evidence - videos and 2 witnesses that would raise suspicion.
No way. Not the behavior of a man who knows his baby is in the car and is deliberately trying to kill him.
A real accident then many people do sympathize and feel sorry for the parents. Just like in pool deaths. Sure people also wish and get angry that the person didnt take extra precaution but they also feel sympathy for the persons. A true accident is an accident and everyone knows that so they can and do forgive.
ETA Meant to add that I could see where he may have wanted to parlay this into some money making adventure by being an advocate going on tour around the country giving speeches or something.
Regardless of his guilt or not he comes across very arrogant to me so I would not put it past him if that was his motive.
Just watched the video. Dr. Ernie Ward, on YouTube, under 5 minutes.
Don't agree that's he's a murderer, so also don't believe in your premise he was obsessing over whether his son was for sure dead yet. The only evidence of obsession that day was his entirely verifiable obsession with sexual gratification.
Im kinda glad they are taking their time too. I much rather have that than them rushing a verdict.
I just hope its not a sign of a hung jury.
Ok suppose he wanted to kill his kid so he could be "child free" or get divorced or pursue a carefree life of sexting or pursue the hand of Ms Meadows or avoid paying for orthodontics in 10 years ....or whatever other crazy motive you might buy into - why would he do it in a way that will almost certainly get him arrested and likely convicted of a felony?
This would be a really stupid way to plan and carry out a murder if you were actually trying to get away with it.
Big difference between the two. Jodi was crazy and her motive was crazy too. It's not like she tried to make it look like an accident.
Cooper's death was not the result of an emotional meltdown that had been building for months like Jodi did. It's the kind of death that has happened hundreds of times by accident. If the jury is going to find him guilty of murder, it's going to have to make sense to them. None of those motives make sense, and none of the surrounding actions and circumstances look like a guilty man trying to hide his crime.
I agree that the tossing of the lightbulbs into the car without leaning down even slightly looks unnatural.
But I am trying to figure out the motivation of that if he is guilty. Since he couldn't see him in that brief moment, it wouldn't determine if the baby was deceased or not. If he heard no sounds, that wouldn't really prove if he was alive or not since he could be asleep or unresponsive. Honestly it was such a brief moment of the door being open I'm not sure he could expect to hear anything anyway.
So what the motivation be if a guilty RH was unable to see or hear anything in that brief encounter at the car?
Fwiw, the video doesn't talk about shade or trees at all. Also, the good vet is sitting in the car for 30 minutes. He talks about how dogs would experience the heat, but his narration is just as much about how HE is experiencing the heat.
A small leap indeed imo for RH or anyone else to imagine (briefly, before the thought really sinks in) a child going through that--" I'd hate to think of my child being in that car.."
Fwiw, the video doesn't talk about shade or trees at all. Also, the good vet is sitting in the car for 30 minutes. He talks about how dogs would experience the heat, but his narration is just as much about how HE is experiencing the heat.
A small leap indeed imo for RH or anyone else to imagine (briefly, before the thought really sinks in) a child going through that--" I'd hate to think of my child being in that car.."