pittsburghgirl
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 30, 2005
- Messages
- 3,533
- Reaction score
- 9,069
Am I correct in that the waitress said that Suzie appeared to be very drunk and Sherill was trying to keep her calm? Could LE have discounted this encounter because it didn't fit with the timeline that they thought was the correct timeline? How many times during that week would all three of them have the opportunity to walk into George's Restaurant?
The George's sighting has always interested me, though certainly eyewitness testimony is not reliable, although missing on three people is a lot more than just mistaking one. And your last question (were they ever in there before, together?) is a good one. When the forensic astrology forum looked at this case, the astrologer said they had gone to George's. But that, of course, is an interpretation of something (astrological event charts) that many on this thread may dismiss outright.
What the George's sighting does for me is provide a possible answer to the question of how the three women might have become the random targets of a predator or predators. Since I don't think the abductions/murders began as a routine burglary or robbery, and I don't think the families were involved, that leaves 1) the women were random victims of a predator or predators or 2) the women were acquainted with the abductor/murders (e.g., the grave robbers). If the victims knew their killer(s), then the answer is in their daily lives, their routines, their history. If not, then the question is how the women became targets--was it the house that was the target--and perhaps Sherrill as the original target? were the girls followed from a party? stalked? or were they seen somewhere that night at a convenience store or a place like George's? That's why I am still interested in George's.