midwest mama
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 7, 2012
- Messages
- 1,303
- Reaction score
- 46
No, because any time the top and the duvet were in the house at the same time the opportunity existed for innocent primary transfer, and for secondary transfer. The fiber evidence, if it exists, will be inconclusive.
Of course this could be possible - given the duvet had been out of the suitcase at some time prior to the murder. The details are sketchy, which is a problem for sure, but the duvet was said to have been brought from JAR's dorm room to the Ramsey house IN the suitcase. So, if it was still in the suitcase when found, with a semen stain on it, and it came from the dorm room, doesn't it stand to reason that if the suitcase had not been opened for some reason and then transported to the basement, that no fibers should have escaped to create "transference"?