perfectingpink
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 11, 2012
- Messages
- 10,046
- Reaction score
- 15,017
I want to hear from C.'s dad!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Located! Amber alert cancelled!
So sorry, I was mistaken
So the fact that Simpson has legal custody of her, does that change any legalities related to the search for her? Does it change, for example, whether they can get cell phone pings or bank records? It seems very obvious that he didn't have good intentions - but does the fact that he IS her legal guardian give him certain rights of privacy?
The way that I read the information is that Mr. Simpson was given permission to pick the child up at school on school documents... like those that are filled out at the beginning of the school year. It does not mean that he has legal custody of the child via the courts... IMHO.
http://wjhl.com/2016/05/04/breaking-tbi-endangered-child-alert-issued-for-9-year-old-rogersville-girl/
"Mr. Simpson had picked the child up from school on a previous occasion, as well. Additionally, documentation on file at the school listed Mr. Simpson as a legal guardian. Upon further investigation, court files verify that Mr. Simpson and his wife are the legal custodial guardians of the missing child."
Not seeing any links for her being found. :thinking:
I can't find the news article now, but the first paragraph stated thhe father has custody now, and the uncle doesn't. The school's statement to me sounds like they have the older custody paperwork on file, and it hasn't been updated. That's at least the way I look at it. Otherwise, it wouldn't be kidnapping. Or am I missing something?
http://wate.com/2016/05/04/endangered-child-alert-issued-for-9-year-old-rogersville-girl/
This states the uncle has no custodial rights to C. The statement about the custody on file comes from the school.