Assuming the first kidnapping was a strike AND Tennessee allows juvenile strikes to follow the perpetrator into the adult world (California does), then this would be his second strike. A theft would not be a strike; it’s serious and/or violent felonies.Tennessee 3 strike law.
(Self reporting for permission to use source)
The concern was whether or not a legal presumption of death could be made, if need be, in the future, so that he could be prosecuted for murder.
I guess it's a shame it wasn't armed robbery. JMO
Where did you hear info that leads you to believe there was “a lot of blood” in the car? All I saw was the info given to LE from his brother that he was cleaning the his car, and I took that to mean there probably wasnt a lot of blood, since it would be a massive thing to clean a lot of blood. Everything is relative though, your definition of ”a lot” and mine may be different!
Her maternal grandfather’s company Orgill Inc.is considered a billion dollar business. But, I see no indication from her housing or employment that EF lived like an heiress or what I would call an official heiress (like Paris Hilton). If I had a billion dollars and my granddaughter was missing, I’d be offering a million/billion for her SAFE return. I do not think CA knew her family history.
He probably punched her in the face and head and knocked her out, ugh
Three strikes and they all have to be serious and violent felonies? That is so messed up. I would be interested to know if there is research on the progression of crimes. I highly doubt a criminal lessens the intensity of his crimes. I would think that he/she becomes more and more violent.
wreg.com
I agree, there are a few similarities here with the Aniah Blanchard case. It's been two years and Yazeed still hasn't been convicted. IMO, that was a pretty open and shut case as well.
During interrogations Police often ask if there is any reason you knew each other or why her dna would be in your car? Has she been in your car before? Etc. Career criminals are savy. Maybe he made something up like, she was on her period and having an affair. They met because he has done yard work or landscaping for her in the past. Blah blah blah. I know it's a stretch but just thought
I went back and read the section about the September 1 police report. That report lead LE to his address. The very next line says that the investigators then contacted his employer and she verified what he drove and what his phone number was. Based on that serious of events I am wondering if the Sept 1 police report is related to his job?
Perhaps he had gotten rid of her and realized the clothes were still in the vehicle. The feeling I get is of someone panicked, scurrying about without thought.
Oh WOW! I heard that her uncle worked in same law office as Durand but it was “rumor” so I kept my mouth shut (I know that’s unlike me) - this could be a good sign that he has her somewhere?!?. He didn’t have time to request a ransom?.
