SmoothOperator
Sadly what connects all these puzzles is that ther
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2010
- Messages
- 5,591
- Reaction score
- 75
I think it is possible Holly felt she had a stalker but did not know who it was, and told her mother that much. That would explain Mom's reaction to some extent. I mean, come on, if they all knew who it was, someone would have leaked a name by now, just to put pressure on him, if nothing else. If he is still there, in town, then clearly he is not holding Holly, and if he too, disappeared, there would be an APB. I don't think they know who they are looking for.
I just wanted to further expand on this topic a bit more so am basically using your post as a jumping off point, clu.. Not directed at you..
Some of the questions that arise when working with the theory that the family were fearful of harm coming to them, or to Holly specifically.. And that could be fear from a potential stalker as some have mentioned as a possibility.. Just as well as fear of retribution in some form due to other issues(ie. My hypothetical upthread).. Either way there being prior knowledge to some degree of someone possibly bringing about harm to Holly..
As I've said before if this were the case(ie. Some degree of prior knowledge which led to fear) it would in many ways make several nonsensical details actually begin to make sense(ie. Karen's IMMEDIATE extremely visceral reaction that those around could not at all understand, nor could we).. But at the same time I realize that it does bring about questions about other issues that for some does not at all fit or seem to make sense..
Such as if the family had a level of fear due to prior knowledge that made them fearful of harm coming to Holly that as I've purposed the family knew where/who that "threat" was that posed a potential danger.. Thereby Karen naming that individual in her multiple calls to 911 that morning, as well as Clint's catching the tail end of his sisters abduction as she's being drug from the carport into the woods out back of their home.. Tho, technically he never actually laid his eyes on the face of the perp and only saw him from behind.. Nonetheless due to the family having some level of prior knowledge he feels he knows exactly who the man was that took his sister..
So, imo all of those above issues can all be true and yet still be at a literal standstill as far as legally being able to proceed with charges.. Just because you fear someone may do something eventually does not equate evidence to prove that they in fact did do that which eventually caused harm(Holly's abduction)..
Clint never saw the face of the perp therefor how does his seeing his back in anyway equate to evidence that would hold up in a court of law??.. The whole entire population can be aware of who this perpetrator is, the entire population can feel that he is likely whose abducted and killed Holly.. How does this equate to tangible evidence that would hold up in a court of law to prosecute the man that most know is the most likeliest to have committed these crimes??.. Again it doesn't.. Without evidence and without even Holly's body does it not become clear that not only the Bobo family, but actually every citizen in the tri-state area can "know" exactly who is responsible, but yet at this point in time he continues to walk a free man?..
Knowing and proving in a court of law are two waaaaaay totally different things.. IMO it is these type very real issues that are why this case is at the frustrating standstill that it is..
As for the perp.. I believe another issue that has some of the opinion that there's just no way that the individual who perpetrated this crime is known and has been known is the fact that unlike so many other cases everything is so close to the vest to the point that I believe many may feel this persons not been questioned, interrogated(more than once), offered polygraph, as well as surveilled,etc,etc,etc.. And that just isn't accurate. Just because we have zilch reported, or even leaked to the public thru the media does not at all mean that these type of investigative steps are not being taken, because they are..
All in all I just wanted to explain further why the hypothetical that I offered is not as nonsensical as some may believe.. Or far fetched from reality in terms of being an actual, very real possibility of similar circumstances being at play here in Hollys case..