Defense calls a friend of Karen's [Ms Alford]. Describes going to 40th birthday party with Karen. They got dressed at Alford's home.
David took Karen home after she was found without clothes inside the party house after this witness sees the host, BB staring at Karen in an awkward manner.
Witness offered that she saw David on crutches when he dropped the 2 daughters off at her house for Halloween. She helped get the girls ready for trick or treat. Karen was missing at this point.
Witness agrees David was controlling. Agrees Karen never left her children alone.
Defense calls BD, a Forensic Engineer w/ 15 yrs exp. A professional mechanical engineer degree. Tire specialist. Given 20 depos; testified once. Inspected thousands of tires. This [on the white Murano] tire ran flat or while in a low inflation condition.
Witness, BD, looked at all evidence made available to him including the state's report on the tire. Describes the screw in the tire shown in photo as rusty, weathered.
Front Right Tire - BD states his opinion is that the screw could have become inserted into the tire organically. Additionally, a rock could have forced the screw further into the tire. Both happening at about the same time.
Argues a bunch of stuff from the state's report and also that only one photo of the screw is available showing the inner portion of the tire so he can't know what's on the other side of the screw. He's serious.
Defense and BD discuss tire tread. Passes the witness.
Cross of forensic engineer after the Judge and BD engage in casual conversation. BD, in his favor, resembles a little like StevenMnuchin former Treasurer of US.
State pushes BD's theory on a rock inserting the screw further into the tire while it was being driven.
Witness: ER, a latent print unit examiner issued report in 2018
Compared fingerprints in this case against numerous data bases.
Witness processed the Murano and 2 cell phones
Found 2 fingerprints [different?] in 3 places in Murano NOT belonging to David
No comparisons made on the cellphones; insufficient sample.
Next witness, DSomerville, worked at same company with DS; interacted on daily basis; knew DS had knee surgery and returned to work on crutches. Claims DS was reinjured by collapsing a week before Karen went missing. Used one crutch. Loaned DS $100 because Karen took all of their money day Karen was at Orange Beach with her girls.
Witness NBishop with TBI - issued a search warrant of David's home on
Nov 10, 2011
Violent Crime Unit responded with SW. Occupants left home. Stayed at home several hours. Photos, swabs etc taken.
Jury sent out. Report composed w/ a TBI file maintained. Defense claims TBI witness, NB, did not watch the search even though he was on site.
Judge denies admitting the contents of the TBI report. It will not to be included as evidence because there is no official seal of TN on document, the TBI official, NB, did not personally collect any of the items listed in the report and for other reasons.
Witness continues with Defense. Discuss search but doesn't ask what was found or taken as evidence. Searched David's BMW.
Return Search Warrant would have been prepared by TBI Agent NB. Passes the witness.
Law and Crime Live - Afternoon- Day Five